42
ROUND TABLE REVIEW BUILDING
INSIGHTS LIVE
Round table co-chairs James Parker and Oliver Heath
Exploring Solutions for Biophilic Design in Commercial Spaces
BIOPHILIC DESIGN AMBASSADORS ASSEMBLE IN BRIGHTON The group featured biophilia advocates from the worlds of building and product design including (pictured front) Dawn Scott, Senior Colour Designer at sponsor Dulux Trade I
n February, we staged a round table which was focused on the positive effects of workplace environments on users, and we couldn’t have picked a better venue to demonstrate this in practice – the stunning Projects Nile House in Brighton. Sponsored by Dulux Trade, this event was a real-world discussion inspired by human-centred approaches to biophilic design, which demystifi ed the approach somewhat as being more straightforward than it may seem, but also vividly showed why clients needed to be convinced to include it as a must-have for healthy future workplaces. More and more offi ce workers are doing long shifts where they are focused on a screen and dislocated from nature, but lockdowns re-taught us that we don’t want to be removed from the health benefi ts of the natural world simply because we are at work. It is increasingly designers’ job to show clients the compelling, evidence- based case for biophilic design, including potential returns on investment and physical as well as mental benefi ts for staff. From hormonal benefi ts of nature, light and colour, the group discussed
how spaces can be transformed to work better, but also why this needs to happen more in the mainstream. It’s a well-worn statistic that staff are 90% of a business’ costs, and investing in biophilia is an upfront cost. But there are benefi ts in not only recruitment and retention, but also productivity. However, designers are confronted by often reticent clients, and if they do put their weight behind thorough-going biophilia, design measures can still be easy pickings for value engineering. Greater openness to more natural offi ce approaches has been seen in recent years, with higher-end companies and investors’ ESG goals to fulfi l, the attendant hormonal benefi ts to alleviate stress and increase productivity, and powerful drivers such as the WELL Standard. But as our event co-chair Oliver Heath stated, to fully realise the benefi ts of biophilic design, it needed to be seen as part of a ‘human-centred’ approach which improves quality of life, not confi ned to a sustainability agenda that could mean it’s just about “doing less bad,” said Heath (e.g. reducing toxins).
WWW.ARCHITECTSDATAFILE.CO.UK
ADF APRIL/MAY 2026
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116