IN BRIEF
Q&A Jack Fogg
TT Can you tell us about the imprint Mudlark?
Q&A
SR The goal is to publish distinct voices who have a
compelling and original take on the subject in their area of exper- tise, be it a subject mater they specialise in, or indeed their own lives. We’re looking for projects that marry great writing with ideas that have both commercial and literary appeal. Sometimes the books will be serious, other times they will be lighter, but the common thread will be the qual- it of the execution.
And why the name “Mudlark”? We’ve been talking about the imprint for a while and finding the name was prety much the hardest part. I wanted some- thing—like The Borough Press list in the fiction division—that spoke to the geography and history of the local area, and to the eclecti- cism of the list.
One lunchtime I saw some metal detectorists on the Thames’ banks, which dislodged some memory about mudlarks (no doubt helped by a pub at London Bridge), those people back in the 18th and 19th centuries who would scour the banks of the Thames at low tide looking for things they could sell. I thought that given where HarperCollins’ office is [by the river], the analogy to the acquisition process was prety apt. A colleague also pointed out that the mudlark is a bird, so that led the way for the logo.
Jack Fogg Publishing director, HarperFiction & Non-Fiction
Te founder of HarperCollins’ new imprint Mudlark discusses how it came into being, and the type of writing he is hoping to unearth
Questions Tom Tivnan
Why do you think “quality” non-fiction is having a moment? In times like these, where so much is up in the air, socially and politically speaking, people are drawn towards wanting to beter understand what the hell is going on. The medium doesn’t really mater—some people are going to get the information through podcasts, documentaries or newspapers—and others, in increasing numbers, are turning to non-fiction and to books which can elucidate and, in the best sense, give hope and succour.
Many editors used to say British non-fiction simply didn’t sell abroad. Is that changing? It depends on the project. I’m oſten surprised (and grateful) how open foreign publishers are to books which don’t seem obvious fits for their markets. And yes, I do think it’s geting easier to sell rights to books by British authors. I don’t know whether that’s a question of there being more qualit projects, or greater and more shared experi- ences, country to country. For example, we’ve already sold Rich Humphreys’ book about living on a submarine, Under Pressure, to the US and to Poland. The plan was that it would be more of a tale of his general experiences, rather than the specific “British” experi- ence, but still, it’s great to see that it could play in different markets.
New “boutique” imprints seem to be all the rage. Why is that? The hope of any new imprint is that it will be longstanding and successful and, over time, create a general awareness of the kind of books they would publish. Few consumers would trust a book from a certain imprint over another, but from our point of view the imprint is more directed
I wanted [an imprint name] that spoke to the geography and history of the area, and to the
eclecticism of the list
towards agents, authors and booksellers. I know that it’s certainly more helpful for agents to have obvious places to send projects, and I like to think that there would be writers down the line who would love to be on the same list as the people we are currently publishing.
I would be thrilled if booksell- ers come to trust the output of the imprint and know that it stands for qualit. That’s the ideal.
21
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44