search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
DEEPER FOCUS


SMS and the practice of safety reporting have made it possible to identify new types of operational safety issues that were not immediately explicit before. Safety reporting could involve errors that pilots or maintainers have made and that they report. It could include equipment failures or failure rates that might not be the same as expected. Additionally, safety reporting could cover areas where procedures are difficult to follow and therefore need to be improved. Sometimes it is about interfaces between different groups such as operators and air traffic controllers, and the ways these could be improved.


“With the implementation of SMS, all areas of operations feel that they have a safety voice that can change policies, procedures, and processes that impact their ability to complete the job safely and efficiency. In particular, ground support staff are more inclined to report on operational pressures from customers or from within the organization, that have


the potential to adversely impact operations,” Jacobs notes.


“We have had a few notable success stories, including wrong rig landings, autopilot dropouts, and employee personnel injuries,” Trapp adds. “For the landing issue, we were aware anecdotally and began measuring and reporting to modify the factors and behaviors that contributed to such events. For the autopilot dropouts, we again knew we had a problem and analyzed numbers to show a trend and then address it with other operators who were also having issues. We were able to share this information with other stakeholders to help find a global solution to benefit everyone. We are dedicated to sharing data with our partners to continue to help raise the bar for safety across the industry. Finally, we were able to identify the top drivers for personnel injuries and deploy targeted initiatives, which has led to a very strong performance in taking care of our team.”


SHARING OF SAFETY DATA


Safety data sharing is developing some critical mass among helicopter operators, and this is allowing the identification of common industry issues, as well as the sharing of lessons learned. In this regard, HeliOffshore is playing an important role. HeliOffshore was founded by several leading offshore helicopter operators in 2014, and currently it has more than 100 members, including aircraft and system manufacturers, helicopter operators, and leasing companies.


“HeliOffshore is the focal point and portal


for information sharing across


the offshore helicopter industry. Their InfoShare online system allows for the wide distribution of de-identified safety information that allows individuals and organizations to be active participants in a worldwide safety program. With a pay-to- play approach, organizations understand and accept that success is user driven. There is still much to be done, but we have made significant progress in the past few years,” Jacobs says.


“We play an active role in a number of work streams, providing leadership and our expert technical resources. We also share certain data to help with industry-wide assessments of areas such as system reliability. The HeliOffshore information exchange


– InfoShare – is a key area where we can voluntarily share de-identified data that may be of interest and use to other operators. Some topics can be technical in nature while other information exchanges might be more operational,” Trapp says. “The HeliOffshore team is also developing protocols for the sharing of flight data monitoring (FDM) data, and this is being supported by a new system developed by GE. Other exchanges have revolved around the development of best practice manuals, with the most significant one being created for use in health and usage monitoring systems (HUMS).”


Indeed, more and more data sharing is occurring among helicopter day-to-day


reliability


operators data


today. This and FDM data


includes for


operational performance, as well as line operations safety audit (LOSA) data from observations of frontline performance. “After analyzing the reliability data, HeliOffshore is now working with the original equipment manufacturers on fleet-based priority lists for improvements that would reduce avoidable errors being made during maintenance,” Haskins shares. “We are working with the industry to further develop safety reporting capability and share data across the supply chain. HeliOffshore holds regular InfoShare meetings and discussions in an open forum. We also have our HeliOffshore Space as a collaboration tool that is designed to help 24/7 incident sharing.”


rotorcraftpro.com


71


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88