OTORCRAFT CHECKRIDE
SLIDING TO A STANDARD The Running/Roll-On Landing
Within the FAA’s practical test standard (PTS) for helicopters, the profi ciency requirements to successfully demonstrate a running/ roll-on landing are identifi ed. They are seemingly simple, establish and maintain: a shallow approach angle, a proper rate of closure, and proper fl ight control technique after surface contact. The PTS wants us to talk about surface texture, height/velocity diagram, and factors aff ecting performance data, all really good topics. However, I’ve found a question that few applicants can answer:
Why are we here?
Instructors are teaching the fundamental fl ying skills to successfully conduct a running/roll-on landing, but very little emphasis is placed on why the maneuver may be required. The assumption by the student is that all running/roll-on landings are the same. This couldn’t be farther from the truth. The appropriate use of this maneuver must coincide with the correct scenario or the pilot may be placing undue risk on the fl ight.
During the ground portion of the practical exam, many applicants will correlate this maneuver to high-altitude scenarios only. Since oral questioning presents any evaluator challenges at the correlative level of learning, I accept stated limited-scope answers, but also utilize a scenario during the fl ight to verify the applicant‘s complete insight into this maneuver. It is important that a thorough pre-fl ight briefi ng identifying all aspects of the fl ight includes how emergency procedures will be introduced.
The most common scenario requiring this type of landing is a limited power situation. Often I will introduce a low rotor RPM condition that requires the applicant to conduct a low rotor RPM recovery technique. As an example, the R22 usually cruises
Randy Rowles has been a FAA pilot examiner for 20 years for all helicopter certifi cates and ratings. He holds a FAA Gold Seal Flight Instructor Certifi cate, NAFI Master Flight Instructor designation, and was the 2013 recipient of the HAI Flight Instructor of the Year Award. Randy is currently Director of Training at Epic Helicopters in Ft. Worth, Texas.
64 February 2015
Training Musings By Randy Rowles
around 21-inch manifold pressure (MAP) for a 75kt fl ight profi le. During the low rotor RPM recovery, the applicant will: reduce collective, add throttle, and attempt to reestablish the power setting previously held. To their surprise, I will limit them to no more than 19-inch MAP. Then I pose this question: if the governor is on and you’re not: HOT (air density), HEAVY (weight), or HIGH (altitude), what other situation may cause a low rotor RPM condition to occur? The correct answer: partial power (cylinder loss, magneto, etc.). Roughly half of the applicants presented with this scenario do not know the answer.
So now that you know why you’re going to do the running/roll-on landing, what speed and landing distance should be expected? As with any landing where the power of the helicopter may be limited, a speed utilizing eff ective translational lift (ETL) is prudent and appropriate. But what about a situation requiring this type of landing where there is no power limitation, such as a hydraulic failure? Whereas the landing with a power limitation may benefi t from ETL, the same maneuver during a hydraulic failure is purely for aircraft stability, so speeds above ETL may not be appropriate. Many early turbine pilots only see this maneuver during hydraulic failure training.
The important part of teaching the running/roll-on landing is making sure the student knows which version of this maneuver is appropriate for varying situations. For example, a long, high- speed slide in a helicopter with limited controllability may prove challenging. Conversely, losing ETL 10 feet off the ground when the engine has nothing more to contribute … may prove deadly!
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68
