search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
WATER SYSTEM HYGIENE AND SAFETY


n Prof. Dr. Martin Exner, of the Institute of Hospital Hygiene and Public Health at University Hospital Bonn.


Following the introductions and welcome, Elise Maynard gave an insightful presentation, focusing on water hygiene risk assessments and best practice in this area. She outlined a very practical approach, and framed her talk around five criteria when examining water delivery in hospitals, which are detailed within BS 8580-1: Water quality. Risk assessments for Legionella control. Code of practice,1 and are applicable to many other waterborne organisms. A standard is currently under development for water hygiene risk assessments (BS 8580-2) around the following areas: n Contamination. n Amplification n Transmission. n Exposure. n Susceptibility.


Poor installation highlighted Elise Maynard covered some key healthcare legislation and bacteria to be aware of, as well as showing images of unsatisfactory installation of water systems, which should be identified during a competent risk assessment. There was a strong emphasis on the importance of how layouts – such as the placing and choice of fixtures and fittings within healthcare environments – can directly affect the spread of bacteria in certain settings. During the talk, there was a discussion around the risks of (multi- drug resistant (MDR) bacteria such as P. aeruginosa, and increasing resistance against commonly used antibiotics. This concluded with the agreement that a focus on prevention is key through the establishment of strong and effective Water Safety Groups.


Dr Elaine Cloutman-Green, from Great Ormond Street Hospital, offered a stark reminder of the importance of infection control, pointing out that a review of hospital waterborne infection outbreaks between 1964 and 2014 showed a year- on-year increase in reports to almost 450 per year, and concluded that current risk assessments are not sufficiently robust in preventing infection. She outlined some key routes of transmission of bacteria, including those from basins and taps, from nurses, visitors, patients in bed, showering, and from hospital equipment. A range of issues were discussed – from the design of en-suite bathrooms, through to contamination of plumbing components during installation, and the disposal of patient fluids and other objects into clinical handwashing basins.


Unseen risks highlighted Dr Cloutman-Green then discussed the potential consequences of unseen risks


130 Health Estate Journal October 2019


advice available through regulation and guidelines on how to reduce the risk of infection. He discussed an incident involving the Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital, following an investigation by the Health & Safety Executive, where there were two fatalities from Legionnaires’ disease in 2007,2


and another from the


Glasgow Royal Hospital for Children, where bloodstream infections of Cupriavidus paulculus were found between 2016 and 2018.3


Although


Elise Maynard, managing partner, Elise Maynard Associates LLP, and a Council Member of the Water Management Society.


such as bacteria in water droplets from a basin, or those produced as an aerosol from WCs. New research from University College Hospital London Hospitals (UCLH) NHS Foundation Trust has shown that water droplets can travel up to two metres when splashed from a traditional healthcare basin, but new design innovations can significantly reduce this. She also advocated a multidisciplinary approach to water hygiene risk assessments, as there needs to be varying expertise to call on to truly understand both the engineering and clinical risks. She strongly recommended that WSGs be consulted whenever premises are being redesigned or refurbished, with risk assessments completed at key stages for all projects. This, she said, was especially pertinent during the initial design phases. Dr Paul McDermott’s address covered


initially isolated from a washhand basin following the first patient case, widespread contamination (with a variety of waterborne organisms) of the water system was confirmed shortly afterwards.


Need for a multidisciplinary approach


Again, a multidisciplinary approach was deemed essential in healthcare organisations, as any new building designs can be a lengthy and complex process, often taking years. Dr McDermott advised that the design team is key, and that the Water Safety Group should be involved at the pre-qualification questionnaire (PQQ) stage, with a dedicated designer to check quality of work, and ideally also a Clerk of Works. He stressed the appropriateness of utilising existing guidance documents, and their ‘unequivocal ability’ to safeguard lives. However, in many cases, he told delegates, it seems there are times when this advice simply isn’t followed.


The Markwik 21+ collection is a range of thermostatic tap solutions, designed to be disassembled quickly and washed at high temperatures.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160