INFECTION PREVENTION & CONTROL
(HCDs) used during cardiopulmonary bypass. The investigation showed that these devices can harbour pathogens in the water circuits and generate bio- aerosols in the operating room, leading to airborne transmission.7 “We took cultures and air samples. Legionella bacteria (also transmitted via aerosols) was found, as well as Mycobacterium chimaera, and – due to the different skills sets and understanding of the water and aerosol exposure route – we were able to deal with the outbreak in the Netherlands in just one week,” he commented. Showers can also present issues, and
Joost Hopman highlighted a paper which discussed an investigation that took place after a case of severe and lethal hospital- acquired infection, associated with Carbapenemase-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The incident involved a man in his early 60s, with a left-sided pneumonectomy, who had undergone adjuvant radiotherapy. “We cultured all the patients, and
they were negative on the ward, so we cultured the environment. The shower drains proved to be positive, but we didn’t understand the mode of transmission,” he explained.
Air samples were taken, which proved
to be positive with the exact same strain as the drain. The investigation mapped the ward, identifying eight positive rooms, and these were all interconnected with one sewage system – the microorganisms ‘grew’ and travelled from one side of the unit to another, and also became airborne, which resulted in the infections.
Drain cleaning and disinfection Joost Hopman pointed out that cleaning and disinfection of drains is not easy – it is not sustainable, and finding solutions can be difficult. However, one possible low-cost solution is the use of removable custom-made plastic shower ‘tubs’ to prevent direct contact with the wastewater system of the shower area, and hence prevent backsplash. In a study by Nurjadi et al (2021), this was found to prevent new acquisitions of OXA-48- Producing Enterobacter cloacae, related to hospital shower drains, 12 months post- implementation.8 The proximity of sinks to clinical areas
where central lines are prepared also needs consideration in hospital settings – this has been found to be a significant problem across high resource countries, as well as LMICs. However, in low and medium resource countries water can be especially problematic; UNICEF has reported that 70% of water at the point of consumption is contaminated. Water is also scarce in some parts of the world. Hospitals in South Africa, for example, are experiencing significant problems during the summer months due to the increase
in temperatures. Alcohol-based hand rub can provide an alternative, Joost Hopman suggested. But should we also avoid locating sinks in patient areas? He highlighted a study which evaluated
the effects of the removal of sinks from Intensive Care Unit (ICU) patient rooms and the introduction of ‘water-free’ patient care on Gram-negative bacilli (GNB) colonisation rates. The overall colonisation rate dropped from 26.3 to 21.6 GNB/1000 intensive care unit (ICU) admission days. The reduction in GNB colonisation rate became more pronounced in patients with a longer ICU-Length of Stay (LOS): from a 1.22-fold reduction (≥2 days), to a 1.6-fold (≥5 days; P = 0.002), 2.5-fold (for ≥10 days; P < 0.001) to a 3.6-fold (≥14 days; P < 0.001) reduction. The study concluded that the removal of sinks from patient rooms and introduction of a method of ‘water-free’ patient care is associated with a significant reduction of patient colonisation with GNB, especially in patients with a longer ICU length of stay.9
While the proximity of the sink to the
patient is significant, often sinks are not simply used for handwashing, which increases the risk of infection transmission even further. A study of handwashing sink activities, by Grabowski et al, found that handwashing accounted for only 4% of the total behaviours observed. The sinks were mainly used for getting rid of waste, and video analysis showed that a significant number of activities involved the disposal of waste materials (patient or otherwise)
which would provide nutrients that would promote microbial growth.10 Joost Hopman commented that we
need to move to alcohol-based hand rub where appropriate, and re-think waste management, focusing on the discarding of: n detergents and disinfectants. n biological waste. n drugs and infusion fluids, including antibiotics.
Decontamination He went on to discuss evidence-based decontamination, pointing out that research shows that the most common nosocomial pathogens (Gram-positives and Enterobacteriaceae) may survive on surfaces for months, and can therefore be a continuous source of transmission if no regular preventive surface disinfection is performed.11 Using vancomycin-resistant Enterococci (VRE) as a marker organism, a study highlighted by Joost Hopman investigated the effects of improved environmental cleaning with and without promotion of hand hygiene adherence on the spread of VRE in a medical intensive care unit. The study found that environmental cleaning had the most impact.12 “The emphasis has been on hand
hygiene, but I believe that cleaning and disinfection is even more important,” commented Joost Hopman. This is especially important for high-touch surfaces. He explained that systems are required
October 2023 Health Estate Journal 39
The most common nosocomial pathogens (Gram-positives and Enterobacteriaceae) may survive on surfaces for months, and can therefore be a continuous source of transmission if no regular preventive surface disinfection is performed.11
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124
