ARCHITECTURE & DESIGN


Left: A resident bedroom. Right: The design of the facility focuses on a community space and a welcome centre for family and visitors. An important strategy that was embedded in the


project’s design process was the diverse nature of the team, which included expertise in Inuit design, infection control, accessibility, and long-term care design, along with various uniquely northern civil, geotechnical, and environmental inputs that formed the initial site strategies and analysis. This team was challenged to bring together the greater context while incorporating concepts and details that reflected the site, community, region, and requirements of the territorial government.


Maintaining Inuit traditions The selected site is nestled between Kivalliq Health Centre and Agnico Eagle Centre, neighboured by nearby Nunavut Arctic College and other cultural facilities in the heart of the hamlet of Rankin Inlet. The location, although challenging from a drainage, site services, and terrain perspective, is well-suited as a place for generations to connect – where elders can live, and Inuit traditions can be shared, maintained, and enhanced. The design of the facility focuses on a community space and a welcome centre for family and visitors. The orientation of this public space facing Tupirvik Avenue sets the aerodynamic form that enables persistent north-west winds to scour the site beneath the raised structure and around the building perimeter. As with most buildings in the arctic with ice or ice-rich permafrost conditions, the building required being raised on a platform of steel piles that are drilled into bedrock. This raised architecture sets the stage for mechanical and electrical systems to enter from below through an insulated subfloor system, while protecting the existing permafrost condition on the site. Access to the facility is created through sloped granular areas that terminate near entrances by gabion stone retaining walls.


Assisted residential care The site informed the design, orientation, and layout, as well as the programme, with two neighbourhoods/ houses of 12 resident rooms. This approach enabled the more private home experience to be facing the sloping terrain of the site, with views to the immediate landscape and neighbouring community facilities. These houses are set up to provide both Level 2 and Level 3 assisted living residential care, while designed for Level 4 or Level 5 care for those individuals with more complex needs, such as dementia, when the programme and training develops. While modern long-term care design trends are embedded within the programme and concept, this facility is designed to embrace local and regional culture, with a number of features that include community gathering


and a kitchen in each house that accommodates the preparation of country food – the traditional diet of Inuit, that can include caribou, musk ox, bear, whale, seal, arctic char, shellfish, berries, and other foods that are hunted, fished, or gathered locally. The setting encourages family members to be actively involved with elders through programming and design features that are inclusive and community-focused. Each unit design includes spaces for activities that promote being with other residents in the home. They include a living room and ‘den’, each with exceptional views to the site, and a secure elevated deck to experience the seasonal changes. The design of a community spine creates the setting for bringing residents together while providing important amenities and services. The main multi-purpose room is near the main entry of the facility. It is a large, round room with views to the street, extending toward the community as the most public space in the design. In this area at the entrance zone, the design includes a family lounge, telehealth room, and a quiet room – all important in remote northern centres. The spine connects this more public space with a rotunda flanked by resident spaces that mimic a community setting, with a coffee shop, workshop, haircare, and exercise and prayer room that connect the two households. These centralised services are offset by the support service spaces that include administration, laundry, food services with additional freezer space for country foods, systems areas, and an indoor garage for ambulance transfers.


Architectural response The resulting form is in direct response to culture and climate, with orientation to manage prevailing north- west winds, summer and winter solstice impacts, and site conditions, all balanced with human factors and community values. The design aims to respond to and connect with these unique features associated with life in Rankin Inlet and Kivalliq in general. It strives to be a sustainable and efficient response, while ensuring the deeper expression of Inuit culture in a place that elders and the community can both benefit from today and for years to come.


Acknowledgment n This article, titled ‘Aging in the arctic’, first appeared


in the Winter 2024 issue of Canadian Healthcare Facilities, the official magazine of the Canadian Healthcare Engineering Society (CHES). HEJ thanks the author, CHES, and the magazine’s publisher, MediaEdge, for allowing its reproduction, in slightly edited form, here.


Jeff Penner


Jeff Penner, MAA, OAA, MRAIC, LEED, AP, Principal and Community Architect at Verne Reimer Architecture (VRA) in Winnipeg, Manitoba, is leading community- based projects across Canada, with a focus on the northern territory of Nunavut. His passion for the north stems from time spent in northern Finland (Lapland), where he studied community design. Although he has extensive experience in healthcare design, many of his projects tend to be in the area of community wellness. Jeff is ‘a recognised leader in sport and recreation facility design’, with his expertise in multi-use community recreation design instrumental in creating new relationships with rural and remote communities, indigenous communities, and agencies that provide services for elders, families, and youth. Living in rural Manitoba, Jeff has always been an advocate for communities having access to design.


February 2025 Health Estate Journal 29


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76