search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
SLUICE ROOM EFFICIENCY


Featuring enhanced chemical dosing, powerful antimicrobial surfaces, and fully hands-free operation, the Pulpmatic Eco+ is claimed by DDC to be ‘the most environmentally friendly, economical, and hygienic macerator on the market’.


Helping to prevent HCAIs Getting better performance from sluice room equipment is an obvious way to prevent and control healthcare-associated infections (HCAIs). It reduces infection- related bed blocking, freeing up vital bedspace, and enabling more patients to be treated more quickly – improving patient outcomes and reducing waiting lists.


Improving sluice room machines’


performance also reduces operating costs and improves return on investment – enabling funds to be redirected to other pressing projects. Without the right machine auditing and review information, these improvements are less likely to happen. Intelligence and data are at the heart of the solution: knowledge is power. Ideally, all equipment should be detailed in an asset review outlining the precise location, condition, maintenance history,


DDC Dolphin’s nine-bladed Pulpmatic Ultima is the company’s largest capacity bedpan macerator, and is capable of disposing of up to six pulp items per cycle.


and requirements, of each machine. The whole report should then be summarised for an easy, at-a-glance view of all the Trust’s sluice room assets and their performance.


Not enough detail supplied Something this fundamental sounds simple enough – but in reality, few sluice room equipment manufacturers supply this information in anywhere near the level of detail required. Nor do they provide a whole-of-estate report that covers every machine used by a hospital, regardless of its manufacturer. This is because sluice room equipment is such a specialised area of manufacturing. Of the few companies operating within this important area of healthcare, only one (us at DDC Dolphin) is capable of repairing and maintaining all suppliers’ equipment, and providing the detailed level of


auditing and reporting that FM managers require on a daily basis.


A detailed Asset Report A typical DDC Dolphin monthly Asset Report will include line after line of detailed information about every single medical pulp macerator and bedpan washer-disinfector in the hospital(s). Extensive detail about the performance and condition of scores of machines can be summarised in just half a dozen pages. Information is conveyed in an easy, at-a- glance format. A typical Asset Summary Review will include the: n total number of sluice room assets. n number of DDC Dolphin machines within the facilities.


n number of machines on service contracts.


n number of machines by type. n number of machines under warranty. A condition summary will highlight the number of machines that are: n brand new to three years’ old. n four to six years’ old. n seven years’ old or more. n 10+ years’ old.


It will also detail the number and value


of any outstanding repairs, along with numbers of call-outs, parts fit visits, and services. Below this summary appears an even more detailed asset review. This spreadsheet lists the following information for each individual machine: n account. n make, model, and serial number. n delivery date. n machine condition (on a scale of 1 to 10). n last case date – when the machine was last seen.


n contract end date. n outstanding repair quotes. n call-outs (over the past three years). n total spend (over the past three years). The bottom line totals the outstanding


DDC Dolphin stresses the importance of using high-quality consumables, such as disinfectant and scale inhibitor, in its machines.


56 Health Estate Journal April 2023


repair quotes plus the number of call-outs and total spend over the last three years.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72