search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Reports NEW ZEALAND MARKET “As a regulator we see some risks and benefits of having a


cashless option. An ideal solution could make the system more efficient, safer and reduce risks such as criminality and money laundering. Te Department has not indicated a cashless


preference and we are aware that this, among other options, need to be discussed with stakeholders and any adjustments planned and resolved carefully. We are concerned about many


factors such as the impact disassociating gamblers from physical cash might have on their gambling and whether this has the risk of increasing problem gambling.”


to cash-out at slot venues by redeeming tickets for up to $200. For higher payouts staff attend the terminal and authorise payments.


Te DIA website states that “Tere is a review of Class 4 gambling currently underway and the use of cashless technology in pubs and clubs is being considered as part of that review. Te Department considers this to be the most appropriate first step in assessing the use of cashless technology in the Class 4 environment.”


At the moment limited provision for cashless technology is permitted under the provisions of Minimum Technical Requirements for Class 4 De-Centralised Off Line Cash In Ticket Out Systems of the Gambling Act (Class 4 Gambling Equipment) Minimum Standard 2004.”


A DIA spokesperson said: “Tere is no current public discussion document or statement on games (pokies) being cashless.


“Te Department of Internal Affairs has indicated an intention to have a wider conversation and engage with stakeholders about the possible adoption of cashless payments in the pokies/gambling machine sector.


“As a regulator we see some risks and benefits of having a cashless option. An ideal solution could make the system more efficient, safer and reduce risks such as criminality and money laundering. Te Department has not indicated a cashless preference and we are aware that this, among other options, need to be discussed with stakeholders and any adjustments planned and resolved carefully.


“We are concerned about many factors such as the impact disassociating gamblers from physical cash might have on their gambling and whether this has the risk of increasing problem gambling.”


P122 NEWSWIRE / INTERACTIVE / MARKET DATA


THE POKIES Gaming machines arrived in New Zealand in the


early 1980s and initially were operated without gaming licences until 1988 when the licensing system was introduced.


New Zealand is fairly unique in that it operates a community owned model for pub gaming where net proceeds are returned to the community meaning gambling is not purely for commercial gain.


Te Gaming Act of 2003 sought to use the gaming machines as a way of fundraising and profits are returned to the community via grants and this adds up to around $300m annually. Clubs such as RSAs and Workingmen Clubs also benefit from the gaming funds to assist with club operating costs.


Te pokie machines in New Zealand are regulated by the Department of Internal Affairs and come under the Class 4 category and are operated in commercial venues (bars and pubs) and clubs. Maximum stake is $2.50 and maximum prize for a non jackpot machine is $500 whilst the jackpot linked machines can payout $1,000 maximum.


Tere are various measures in place for the protection of gambling addiction including an over 18 year age limit, pop up messages during play with amount spent or amount won/lost, no ATMs within gaming rooms are permitted and EGMs do not accept banknotes above $20.


Class 4 is operated on a not-for-profit basis with the objective of generating revenue to return to communities via grant processes.


At least 40 per cent of gaming machine proceeds must be allocated to authorised community purposes whilst 23 per cent goes on gaming duty, around 19.5 per cent on society expenses, 16 per cent on venue payments and 1.5 per cent towards problem gambling levies.


Tere is a limit to the number of EGMs per bar/club and this varies between nine and 18 depending on when the licence was granted. If granted before October 2001 the maximum is 18 and after this date the maximum is nine.


Te number of EGMs peaked in 2003 to over 25,000 in the market just before the Gaming Act of 2003 was introduced. Tere has since been a steady decline and today that number is around 15,250 located in 1,117 venues (data December 2018) of which over 80 per cent are non clubs and the remainder club venues.


In 2017 the Gaming Machine Proceeds (GMP) amounted to $883.3m of which $784.2m came from non clubs and $99.1m from Clubs.


Te largest societies to operate venues and EGMs include the New Zealand Community Trust (NZCT), the Lion Foundation and Pub Charity Limited which between them operate over 400 venues and 5,500 EGMs.


Te NZCT is the largest gaming society and largest provider of funds for amateur sports


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176  |  Page 177  |  Page 178  |  Page 179  |  Page 180  |  Page 181  |  Page 182  |  Page 183  |  Page 184  |  Page 185  |  Page 186  |  Page 187  |  Page 188  |  Page 189  |  Page 190  |  Page 191  |  Page 192  |  Page 193  |  Page 194  |  Page 195  |  Page 196  |  Page 197  |  Page 198  |  Page 199  |  Page 200  |  Page 201  |  Page 202  |  Page 203  |  Page 204  |  Page 205  |  Page 206  |  Page 207  |  Page 208  |  Page 209  |  Page 210  |  Page 211  |  Page 212  |  Page 213  |  Page 214  |  Page 215  |  Page 216  |  Page 217  |  Page 218  |  Page 219  |  Page 220  |  Page 221  |  Page 222  |  Page 223  |  Page 224  |  Page 225  |  Page 226  |  Page 227  |  Page 228  |  Page 229  |  Page 230