search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
PUBLISHER’S CORNER Crash Sparks Safety Concerns Written by Tony Corpin | tony@stnonline.com I


am rarely shocked anymore, but I could hardly believe my eyes when I recently viewed a video that we obtained from the Ohio State Highway Patrol. The footage displays a violent school bus crash and


rollover that took place on Dec. 19 in daylight conditions. A passenger vehicle ran a red light in Thornville, Ohio,


located 37 miles west of Columbus, and struck a North- ern Local School District bus headed to Sheridan High School with 25 students on board. They were propelled up and out of their seats. They slammed into bench seats, windows, each other and the bus roof, as the vehi- cle landed on its right side. It was disturbing to watch. Children scream and beg for help. School bus driv- er Danny Hupp, 74, unbuckles his seatbelt and calls for assistance on his cell phone. His students gather themselves and evacuate through the emergency roof hatches, doors and windows. I held my breath. Eight children were injured and transported to local


hospitals. The remaining 17 students sustained bumps and bruises but were not hospitalized. No major injuries were reported. Did the principle of compartmentalization reduce inju-


ries and eliminate fatalities? Would lap/shoulder seatbelts have further helped to reduce injuries in this scenario? Several national media outlets aired clips of the video, and the coverage has clearly reignited the “Great Seat Belt Debate.” An NBC Today Show host said that seatbelts on school buses seem like a “no brainer.” But the discus- sion about tight school district budgets also came up, as the estimated cost of implementing lap/shoulder belts ranges from $7,000 to $10,000 per bus. Meanwhile, two districts in the Cleveland area have


installed school bus seatbelts. Avon Lake City Schools is testing the seatbelts on two buses, with mixed results. Get- ting students to wear the occupant restraints has been one of the issues. The suburban district, located on the shores of Lake Eerie, has employed additional monitors to ensure compliance. Other districts, like Helena Public Schools in Montana, have found success with implementing and enforcing mandatory student usage policies. The other district to implement seatbelts is Beachwood


City Schools, where elementary school students last year successfully petitioned the school board to make avail- able the necessary funds to equip their school buses. The district currently has seatbelts on two of its highway route and field trip buses. Several other local city councils also recently pledged support for pilot programs. We kicked off last year’s inaugural STN EXPO Indy


74 School Transportation News • MARCH 2020


conference with a school bus crash test demonstration hosted by SafeGuard and IMMI at the Center for Advanced Product Evaluation facility. The event sought to simulate a rollover crash by launching the bus off of a ramp to see what would happen to belted and unbelted occupants. Visit stnonline.com/tag/STNIndy19 to view the video. Another crash test is planned for STN EXPO Indy attendees in June. The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) also


determined that compartmentalization is “incomplete” and “does not protect passengers during lateral impacts with vehicles of large mass, in rollovers and from ejection.” A SafeGuard crash test performed in August 2017 depicted a T-bone crash by a work truck, and one of the unbelted dummies was fully ejected out of the school bus. The NTSB stated lap/shoulder seatbelts would protect passengers in most crash scenarios. The federal School Bus Safety Act, co-sponsored by


Sen. Tammy Duckworth and Rep. Steve Cohen, is calling for three-point seatbelts on school buses, in addition to other safety enhancements recommended by the NTSB. But the legislation has failed to move out of committee, where it has sat since last July. Today’s modern school buses have safety equipment


options like passive and active stability control technology, to help drivers avoid losing control. It was unclear at this writing if the 2020 IC Bus that was involved in the Ohio crash had stability controls installed, and if the technology could have made a difference in the outcome of the crash. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration


finalized a rule requiring ESC as a standard feature on Class 7 and 8 truck tractors as well as motor coaches, but it exempted school buses. However, school bus OEMs Blue Bird, IC Bus and Thomas Built Buses and their respective technology partners, Bendix Commercial Ve- hicle Safety Systems and Meritor, proactively made the safety feature standard equipment on Type C models. According to Jeff Cassell, founder and president of the School Safety Company, nothing seems impossible with today’s technology. But ultimately, safety comes down to driver training, defensive driving techniques and best practices when operating a school bus. I recommend looking at all of the available data when


investing in any new safety technology and training tools. Research and measure the best options for your operation. Your students and bus drivers will be glad you did. ●


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76