ly fee including upgrades and authorized school district person- nel access. “Cloud-based video management


and AI-enabled tools create infra- structure considerations: Storage, bandwidth, cybersecurity, moni- toring, backups, and support,” said Wigle. “As video systems become more connected and data volumes increase, districts need a storage strategy matching how the video will actually be used.”


Understanding Storage Needs Not every clip needs to be


stored permanently, and not every incident requires the highest-res- olution file to be downloaded or retained, said Wigle. Scott advised that storage needs


When you consider the primary purpose of onboard school bus cameras— protecting


students, drivers and staff— the additional


investment is well justified.


depend on the number of cameras, resolution, bit rate, compression technology, frame rate, and reten- tion period, adding districts should ask vendors how many days of recording a configuration provides under the actual camera configuration and at what resolution and frame rate as well as if storage should be expand- ed later, what happens when it becomes full, and how quickly can video be retrieved. “Rather than simply installing larger hard drives, transportation departments should consider how video will be uploaded, accessed, retained, and secured,” added Jetha. “Cellular connectivity, cloud integration, retention requirements, cybersecurity standards, and future AI applications are becoming important parts of the system design conversation.” School districts can evaluate whether their solution can scale as camera resolutions increase and new video analytics capabilities emerge, she added. “Districts should plan their video system around their


-Ryan Johnson, Lyon County School District in Nevada


storage is calculated, what com- pression is used, if retention settings vary by event type and is storage expandable, what happens when storage is full, and how easy is video retrieval. Bryer noted districts able to still


pull hard drives manually could save on costs associated with accessing video through a wireless network, network infrastructure and the need for cellular data plans for streaming or real-time downloads. Transcending storage capacity needs are retention policies, access controls, compliance requirements, and how video will be managed throughout its lifecycle, said Monfared, adding districts should involve in-house legal teams and consult external counsel to ensure legal compliance. Capturing high-quality video pro- duces larger files, which take longer


to upload and require more storage space, noted Moore. The number of cameras, video resolution, frames per sec- ond and metadata impact file sizes and upload times. Moore noted districts can avoid performance limitations


operational requirements before selecting hardware, storage, or cloud services,” noted Wigle. “They should identify how many cameras will be installed per vehicle, which cameras need high resolution, how often video will be reviewed, how long footage must be retained, and whether video will be stored locally, downloaded wire- lessly, or retained in the cloud.” Howard said retention policies should align with


district procedures, legal requirements, insurance needs and student discipline timelines. AngelTrax recommends districts ask vendors how


34 School Transportation News • SEPTEMBER 2026


by selecting the right amount of storage from the start. Addressing privacy issues, Moore shared, “Video foot- age is much safer in the cloud than it ever was floating around on a flash drive or being recorded on district personnel’s phones for sharing.” Ryan Johnson, Nevada’s Lyon County School District transportation supervisor, discussed a shift from tradi- tional hard drives and local downloads to Gatekeeper’s cloud-based storage. Remote access and more connect- ed camera systems have introduced efficiencies such as less involvement required by staff and time savings in retrieving and reviewing video. “When you consider the primary purpose of onboard school bus cameras—protecting students, drivers, and staff—the additional investment is well justified,” John- son said, adding the district has absorbed additional costs without reducing services. “Our video retention policies have remained largely unchanged. For signif- icant incidents, we continue to maintain locally stored copies of the footage for up to four years to ensure long- term availability if needed,” he said. Lyon County upgraded from its previous camera sys-


tem of three interior cameras with video stored locally on hard drives to five interior cameras, one exterior


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76