However, the impact extends far beyond the replacement cost of the stolen material.


When thieves rip out copper pipework, they often leave significant collateral damage in their wake, with ceilings, walls and building services being affected. The subsequent repairs can create programme delays, require extensive recommissioning works and generate additional labour costs, while occupied buildings may also face operational disruption and business interruption.


In many cases, the true cost of a theft can be several times greater than the value of the copper that has been removed.


Water escape: The other risk


specifiers cannot ignore Alongside theft, water escape continues to represent one of the most significant causes of property-related insurance claims across the UK. According to research published by the Financial Conduct Authority, the average cost of ‘escape-of-water’ claims increased by approximately 16 per cent per annum between 2017 and 2020 for multi-occupancy buildings.


For high-value developments such as hotels, luxury apartments and multi-occupancy residential buildings, even relatively minor leaks can result in substantial remediation costs, particularly when water damages internal finishes, furnishings, or electrical systems.


As with theft, the implications extend well beyond the immediate repair works. Delayed occupancy, loss of revenue, increased insurance premiums and reputational impacts can all become part of the wider financial equation, reinforcing the importance of designing systems that actively reduce the likelihood of failure.


As a result, many clients are increasingly looking to project teams to demonstrate how risk has been considered and mitigated through the specification process, rather than relying solely on operational management strategies once the building is occupied.


Why material choice matters more


than ever When considering how to reduce exposure to both theft and water-related risks, material selection represents one of the most effective opportunities available to designers and specifiers. By specifying materials that are unlikely to be targeted, you can reduce the potential for theft-related disruption, damage and associated financial losses before construction has even begun.


This is one way in which multilayer composite pipe (MLCP) systems offer a compelling alternative to copper.


MLCP has little inherent value within the scrap metal market, making it significantly less attractive to thieves. At the same time, modern MLCP systems have been developed to support reliable installation and long-term performance. Multilayer press-fit connections provide a highly controlled connection that can be reviewed post


www.tomorrowsfm.com


installation, while the manufacturing consistency associated with


multilayer pipe systems supports a more standardised installation process when compared with traditional metallic


pipework solutions.


Rethinking specification sustainability Sustainability comprises a number of important considerations, including embodied carbon, recyclability and material longevity. Aspects such as embodied carbon can usually be measured using Environmental Products Declarations (EPDs); however, many copper tube and copper press fittings do not have the relevant EPD. There is also a growing argument that resilience should form part of the sustainability benchmarking.


A building that experiences theft incidents, significant water damage or frequent insurance claims will inevitably require additional materials, labour and resources throughout its lifecycle. This creates both financial and environmental costs that may not be captured through traditional specification assessments.


From this standpoint, the most sustainable specification may not necessarily be the one with the lowest embodied carbon or the longest theoretical service life. It may be the one that also delivers the greatest resilience, minimises operational disruption and reduces lifecycle risk for owners and occupants alike.


Managing risk through smarter specification As the industry continues to navigate rising theft levels, rising insurance costs, and growing pressure to deliver resilient buildings, risk management is becoming an important factor in specification decisions.


The conversation is no longer solely about how a system performs. Instead, it is increasingly focused on how effectively a building can withstand the challenges that arise throughout its operational life, whether that involves theft, water damage, disruption or unforeseen maintenance events.


For specifiers, this represents an opportunity to move beyond traditional material assumptions and adopt a more holistic approach to building performance. By embracing resilient pipework solutions such as MLCP, specifiers have an opportunity to reduce theft exposure, minimise disruption and create buildings that are better prepared for the realities of modern ownership and occupation.


In an increasingly risk-conscious market, designing out risk is no longer an optional consideration. It is a fundamental part of good specification practice.


www.uponor.com https://www.uponor.com/en-gb/mlcp?utm_source=tomorrows-fm&utm_medium=media&utm_campaign=mlcp TOMORROW’S FM | 43


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62