search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
FEATURE


“Of the £36bn available in the next three years, only £5.3bn will be invested in social care – less than 15%.”


the Government wishes to meet its ambitious overall goal of providing a seamless experience of integrated care.


Additional problems lie in managing the balance between the number of patients the NHS can treat and discharge and the aſtercare provided by social services. The additional funding for the NHS will eventually reduce the number of patients waiting for the urgent services they require. However, due to the disparity between the allocation of the funds raised by the increase in the NIC, social care is at risk of further falling behind NHS services. With only £5.3bn being made available over the next three years, the concern is that the sector will not be able to match the number of patients discharged from the pandemic NHS backlog.


Leaders in care, such as Dr. Ben Maruthappa, CEO of digital healthcare company Cera, are calling for the sector to be taken seriously as a vital point of contact for those needing essential aſtercare, such as rehabilitation, home care, home adaptations, and mental health services for those having to adjust to significant day-to-day changes. The Government will have to carefully manage this balance and exercise prudence in controlling the flow and interdependency between NHS services and social care.


The Government also introduced a long-awaited lifetime cap on social care cost at £86,000. This means that once an individual contributes a total of £86,000, they will no longer have to contribute towards their social care. However, the recommendations for such a cap were suggested way back in the 2011 Dilnot Commission and later abandoned in 2014, when it was due to come into effect in the Care Act of 2014. Further, introduction of the new cap will only commence in 2023, meaning that people will have to continue making expensive payments for another two years; already overburdened local council care facilities will be pushed further past the breaking point if even more residents are unable to sustain living in private care. The length of time taken to introduce the new cap casts a doubtful eye on whether its implementation can guarantee the outcomes it hopes to achieve.


On top of that, the cap does not include other costs that individuals will still need to meet, such as daily living costs


twitter.com/TomorrowsCare


which include bills, food, and accommodation. Like the impact of Brexit on staff shortages, these bills are not included in the Government’s report, which begs the question as to how much of the social care crisis the government is realistically preparing to restructure and divert attention and resources towards the social care sector.


Alongside the absence of a plan to cover daily living costs, the new cap does not include previous payments made by individuals towards their own care, meaning those who have paid substantial amounts to service providers will have to continue paying until they reach the new cap. For these people, they can only hope that their assets have fallen to £20,000, which is the new point at which they will not have to pay anything towards their own care. Unfortunately, they will still have to continue meeting the costs of their daily living requirements.


Due to the Government’s COVID-19 stamp-duty holiday, average house prices have seen an inflation, which will affect future generations of people who could potentially need social care services. If people’s homes, their main asset, continue to increase in value, they will find it harder to qualify for subsidised support if their total assets fall outside the Government’s new range of £20,000-£100,000.


Ironically also this increase in National Insurance contributions may well have a higher impact on lower paid workers – which would of course include healthcare assistants and nurses working in the social care sector.


It is clear that resolving the social care crisis must involve tackling key pressures such as staffing shortages, the relationship between the NHS and social care, and the expensive accommodation costs. The Government’s announcement is positive insofar as there is a refreshing new attention directed towards social care services. However, it is not surprising that the new funds may be insufficient to address the multifaceted complexities facing a social care service already on its knees. Over the next few years, the Government needs to pay continuous attention towards these pressures, and, where possible, increase funding to match the serious attention this already crumbling sector demands.


www.blmlaw.com - 21 -


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52