RECIPE FOR SUCCESS
When it comes to specifying a floor for a food and beverage facility, both MMA and PU systems are popular choices. To help you to make the correct decision, Flowcrete UK explores their properties and applications.
McVities installed two polyurethane finishes in its Glasgow facility in order to tailor the floors texture to different operational demands
Choosing the right floor for a food and beverage (F&B) facility is a tricky task, as it will have to withstand challenging onsite conditions while consistently maintaining a clean and hygienic environment.
There are a number of flooring options that have become popular in the F&B world for being able to provide this combination of properties two of the most common being methyl methacrylate quartz (MMA) and polyurethane (PU).
SPOT THE DIFFERENCE While both are resin materials, the specific chemistry of each is very different and will provide different functionalities. Knowing when to apply an MMA quartz or PU requires understanding the floor’s properties as well as what chemicals, impacts, traffic, temperatures and cleaning it will encounter, in order to ascertain if the system in question is up to the task at hand.
The difference between these two types of materials stems in large part from their molecular structure, which affects how it fuses together during the curing process and how it will react to substances.
PUs are typically two-component systems (a resin and a hardener) that when brought together undergo a process of stoichiometric curing to form a solid layer. In contrast, MMAs work by using a catalyst to trigger a reaction that creates a single monolithic mass fused to the substrate. Quartz
aggregates are often broadcast into an MMA system in order to add strength, texture and decoration.
HARD-WIRED TO BE HARD-WEARING One of the biggest differences is that once a PU has cured it will have a very high cross-linked density that makes it exceptionally hardwearing. In fact, PUs are so robust that they are one of the most failure resistant types of floors and are capable of providing a high-performance surface for up to a decade if properly maintained, even despite the abuse that a busy, complex F&B plant will subject it to.
Alternative materials struggle to provide this life-span when faced with operational challenges such as steam cleaning at up to 120°C, point loading from heavy production equipment, exposure to corrosive industrial chemicals such as sodium hydroxide and nitric acid as well as the intensive cleaning and long hours inherent to the sector.
An MMA quartz system derives strength from its monolithic structure. However, with this type of system a thin wearing coat is required to stop the aggregates and finish from getting scratched or abraded. This final layer, which isn’t required for PU floors, will usually need to be recoated every couple of years.
THE CURE FOR CURING The key advantage of an MMA system is that it is able to fully
36 | COMMERCIAL KITCHENS & FOOD PREPARATION
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50
