search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
BEST PRACTICES :: CARDIAC BIOMARKERS


Short and long-term effects of the COVID pandemic on cardiovascular patients


By Sean-Xavier Neath, MD, PhD T


he COVID-19 pandemic has created a number of diagnostic challenges for clinicians and laboratorians world-wide. Even during the relatively quiet “off-peak” periods of acute


COVID, there remain the challenges of helping the large group of patients left with the shrapnel of “long Covid.” Kaufman and Meyer, in a recent edition of this journal,1


present an excellent


overview of the evolving long-term health consequences of COVID-19. This article will focus on the cardiovascular elements of acute COVID and long COVID with an emphasis on how deployment of known cardiovascular biomarkers can help aid in the identification, risk-stratification and treatment of patients. While COVID-19 is primarily thought of as a respiratory


illness, it became apparent early in the pandemic that the cardiovascular system is not spared from the effects of the disease. This makes sense mechanistically as the virus gains entry to human cells via the angiotensin-converting enzyme2 (ACE2), which is ubiquitously present in the body, including the cardiovascular epithelium. Additionally, it became quickly clear that patients with preexisting cardiovascular conditions were at higher risk for going on to develop severe COVID-19 disease.2


Similarly, patients hospitalized with severe COVID-19


even without pre-existing cardiovascular disease have had a significantly higher rate of cardiovascular complications such as myocardial infarction, heart failure, vascular thrombotic events, and myocarditis. Interestingly, myocarditis and heart failure can also be seen as rare but serious complications of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines absent any active viral infection, particularly in younger men.3


In all these patient groups,


there is diagnostic and prognostic utility of cardiovascular biomarker management using necrosis markers (cardiac troponin), natriuretic peptides (BNP or nt-proBNP), and thrombosis markers (d-dimer). Throughout the pandemic, a number of biomarkers have


been identified to risk stratify patients presenting to the ER with COVID. In particular, either a troponin or a d-dimer


28 JUNE 2022 MLO-ONLINE.COM


value twice the upper limit of normal is associated with severe disease.5


Mueller and colleagues have published an overview of


cardiovascular biomarkers in patients with COVID that helps differentiate some of the nuances in interpretation needed in patients with COVID.6 Troponin should be measured in hospitalized patients with


COVID, and repeated if abnormal or if new clinical criteria arise. In non-critically-ill patients with COVID-19, modest elevations (up to 3 times the ULN) are often due to prior cardiac disease or myocardial ischemia related to respiratory failure. Higher concentrations (>3x ULN) are more likely to be due to the presence of specific acute cardiac disease such as myocardial infarction, myocarditis, or takotsubo syndrome. Natriuretic peptides (NPs), such as BNP, nt-proBNP or MRpro-ANP should be measured if heart failure is suspected on clinical grounds. In patients who are not critically ill, NPs cut- offs for heart failure “rule-in” maintain high positive predictive value, even in patients with pneumonia. In contrast, currently recommended NP cut-offs should not be applied in critically ill in patients with ARDS or septic shock, as most critically-ill patients have substantial elevations in BNP/NT-proBNP, due to overwhelming hemodynamic decompensation. D-dimers are generated by cleavage of fibrin monomers by plasmin, therefore, signal thrombus formation and resulting fibrinolysis. A d-dimer value lower than its assay specific cut-off has a high-negative predictive value to help rule out venous thromboembolism in low-risk patients. In more seri- ously ill patients, d-dimer can be used for the diagnosis and monitoring of disseminated intravascular coagulation associ- ated with sepsis or shock. During the outbreak of COVID-19, a coagulopathy has been commonly observed in hospitalized patients that can be identified by d-dimer values. One mecha- nistic explanation is that severe acute respiratory distress syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) has a high affinity to endothelial cells and may induce ‘endotheliitis’, which


Photo by DragosCondrea@Bigstockphoto.com


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52