search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
OPERATION & MAINTENANCE OF POWER PLANTS I


nterest in hydrogen as an energy carrier has been steadily increasing over the last decade, with many studies being performed


into its generation, transport, storage, and use. The reason for the interest is clear; hydrogen is a carbon-free fuel that can be produced with renewable energy and combusted like natural gas. However, the physical properties of hydrogen are considerably diff erent to those of natural gas, preventing it from being a direct replacement. The blending of hydrogen into existing natural gas pipelines (typically up to 20% by volume) is being investigated in numerous countries as a way to reduce CO2 emissions. This solution has the advantages of continued use of the existing infrastructure and resilience to variations in hydrogen production and availability.


HYDROGEN BLENDING The main issues with hydrogen blending result from the aforementioned diff erences between hydrogen and natural gas. Hydrogen has a higher fl ame temperature, considerably higher fl ame speed and lower air requirement for combustion, meaning that substantial eff iciency gains can be achieved by optimising combustion processes for gas composition. Furthermore, the volumetric energy content of hydrogen is approximately one third of that of natural gas. As such, knowledge of the hydrogen content is key to both eff iciency gains for combustion processes, but also fair billing of gas consumption. With hydrogen injection and blending likely distributed throughout the network, this means that not only large temporal, but also spatial variability in hydrogen content can be expected.


MEASUREMENT In this scenario, it is important to determine the hydrogen content, however the requirements on the instrumentation and sensors are quite high. Reference level instruments


Correlative measuring instruments can be used for most concentration ranges


The effi cient use of hydrogen blended into natural gas requires the right measurement technology, and correlative instrumentation can help


MEASURING HYDROGEN


for gas quality determination, such as gas chromatographs, are often too expensive, complicated, or slow. This has opened the door for other specialised instruments, employing e.g. correlative principles, which infer (or correlate) a property of the gas mixture based on the measurement of one or more other gas properties such as the thermal conductivity, heat capacity, speed of sound or density. For applications involving hydrogen, correlative measurements function well, as the physical properties of hydrogen diff er greatly from those of natural gas. Correlative measuring instruments often have surprising benefi ts: they seldom require recalibration, are nearly immune


to poisoning, absolute measurement accuracy is not tied to gas concentration, and they can be used for most concentration ranges. The gasQS static from


Correlative measuring instruments are nearly immune to poisoning


Mems AG is an example of a correlative measuring instrument that operates on the principle of thermal conductivity measurements. Through laboratory calibration the thermal conductivity is equated to the concentration of hydrogen in the gas, which is returned


as a 4-20 mA signal. The static is employed in the regulation of gas motors (ignition timing) and burners (power and air fl ow regulation), in hydrogen blending stations and for tracing hydrogen concentrations through distribution networks. The fast reaction time (T90 of 2 seconds), direct pipeline connection and no venting of gas are particularly valued characteristics for these applications. ●


For more information visit https://mems.ch/en/index.php


The GasQS static from Mems AG operates on the principle of thermal conductivity 20 www.engineerlive.com


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52