search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
48 May / June 2019


Rapid Determination of Strawberry Flavour Integrity using Static Headspace-Selected Ion Flow Tube Mass Spectrometry


by Kalib J.M. Bell, Vaughan S. Langford Syft Technologies Ltd, 3 Craft Place, Christchurch 8024, New Zealand


Automated, direct headspace analysis using selected ion flow tube mass spectrometry (SIFT-MS) provides rapid and economic screening of flavour mixes. By coupling the SIFT-MS analysis with multivariate statistical analysis, rapid determination of ingredient flavour quality can be achieved without needing to resort to expert data interpretation. In this paper, classification of different batches of various strawberry flavour mix types of unknown, proprietory compositions is achieved with analysis times of less than one minute per sample. This approach has quality control applications for the food industry.


Introduction


Unintended use of an out-of-specification flavour mix in foods, beverages or nutritional formulations can lead to reduced consumer confidence and product losses. However, traditional screening using a trained sensory panel is expensive. Viable instrumental alternatives for determining acceptance are few due to various practical limitations:


• The gold-standard VOC analysis methods - gas chromatography (GC), gas chromatography-olfactometry (GC-O), and liquid chromatography (LC) - are slow and can struggle with the diversity of compounds in flavours. They also require significant sample preparation, including derivatisation for the short- chain aldehydes and organic acids.


• Electronic noses are subject to significant drift, susceptible to contamination and false positive readings (e.g. from ethanol residues), and cannot identify individual flavour components.


• Traditional direct mass spectrometric (DMS) methods are too harsh or not selective enough to give unique spectral fingerprints.


Selected ion flow tube mass spectrometry Figure 1. Schematic diagram of SIFT-MS – a direct chemical-ionisation analytical technique.


(SIFT-MS), on the other hand, is a direct mass spectrometry (DMS) technique that eliminates chromatography and applies very soft chemical ionisation. In doing so, SIFT-MS can selectively fingerprint samples of proprietory composition – without identification of flavour compounds – in less than one minute.


Recently, rapid geographical classification of Mediterranean olive oils [1] and Moroccan Argan oils [2] has been achieved using untargeted SIFT-MS analysis combined with multivariate statistical analysis. In this paper, a similar approach is applied to classify various commercial strawberry flavour mixes for intra-mix (i.e. batch) and inter-mix variations.


Method 1. The SIFT-MS technique


SIFT-MS [3,4,5] uses soft chemical ionisation (CI) to rapidly quantify VOCs to low parts- per-trillion concentrations (by volume, pptV). The SIFT-MS technique is represented schematically in Figure 1. Eight individually selectable reagent ions (H3 -, NO2


O+ OH- , O2 - and NO3 , NO+ , O2 +, O- , -) are generated in a


microwave discharge through moist or dry air. These eight reagent ions react with VOCs and other trace analytes in well-controlled ion-molecule reactions, but they do not react with the major components of air (N2 O2


,


and Ar). This enables real-time analysis of air samples at trace and ultra-trace levels


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68