search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Single component integration


Gasoline Range Organics


Environmental Laboratory 19 Average Measured


Conc. (µg/L, n = 10)


Single Component Integration


Methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE)


Benzene Toluene


Ethylbenzene


m-Xylene, p-Xylene o-Xylene


EPA 8015 C Total Peak Area Integration B


1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene


7.1 3.7


141.2 24.8 53.1 53.7 8.0


31.1


Average Measured Conc. (µg/L, n = 10)


Total Area Integration (Wisconsin)


53.3 53.3


53.3 53.3 53.3 53.3 53.3 53.3


Total Peak Area Integration


(EPA 8015 C)


56.0 56.0


56.0 56.0 56.0 56.0 56.0 56.0


Figure 4. Example of tap water sample (5 mL) spiked with raw gasoline solution (5%) chromatogram applying single component integration (A) and total area integration (EPA 8015 C integration window), (B). Chromeleon “Peak Results” view (C) allows the display of the peak results for both integration types. Average quantitative results for n = 10 tap water samples spiked with raw gasoline and integrated using single components and total area are reported in the table (D).


Author Contact Details Giulia Riccardino and Cristian Cojocariu, Thermo Fisher Scientific • Tudor Rd, Runcorn WA7, UK • Tel: 01928 534000 • Web: www.thermofisher.com


C


D


Figure 4. Example of tap water sample (5 mL) spiked with raw gasoline solution (5%) chromatogram applying single component integration (A) and total area integration (EPA 8015 C integration window), (B). Chromeleon “Peak Results” view (C) allows the display of the peak results for both integration types. Average quantitative results for n = 10 tap water samples spiked with raw gasoline and integrated using single components and total area are reported in the table (D).


Figure 5. Comparison between chromatograms obtained analyzing n = 5 blank water vials after completing the sample sequence and a sample spiked with 1 µL of raw gasoline solution (5%) (red trace). None of the investigated gasoline organics or any residual matrix components could be detected in the blank water.


www.envirotech-online.com AET October / November 2019


MTBE


Benzene


Toluene


Ethylbenzene o-Xylene


m-Xylene, p-Xylene


1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene


Naphthalene


A


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44