search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Optical TEM Specimen Holder


Figure 7: (left) Image of 405 nm laser spot on filter paper and (right) line profile of the laser spot.


[7] F Cavalca et al., Nanotechnol 23 (2012) https://doi. org/10.1088/0957-4484/23/7/075705.


[8] C Liu et al., Rev Sci Instrum 92 (2021) https://doi. org/10.1063/5.0031115.


[9] Torlabs Part No. FN96A: Guide to Connectorization and Polishing Optical Fibers, https://www.thorlabs.com/ thorproduct.cfm?partnumber=FN96A.


[10] JH Hubbell and SM Seltzer, X-Ray Mass Attenuation Coefficients, NIST Standard Reference Database


Figure 8: (left) HRTEM image of GaAs and (right) corresponding FFT.


authors would also like to thank Lakhbir Johal (Stanford Termosciences Machine Shop) for help with machining and fabrication. Tis research was funded by the Defense University


Research Instrumentation Program (DURIP) under Grant No. N00014-19-1-2463, as part of the Center for Enhanced Nanofluidic Transport (CENT), an Energy Frontier Research Center funded by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Science, Basic Energy Sciences (BES), under Award No. DESC0019112, and using financial support by the Air Force Office of Scientific Research under grant number FA9550-19-1- 0309. Part of this research was performed at the Stanford Nano Shared Facilities (SNSF), supported by the National Science Foundation under Award No. ECCS-1542152.


References [1] OL Krivanek et al., Nature 514 (2014) https://doi. org/10.1038/nature13870.


[2] Z Zhang et al., Nano Lett 21 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1021/ acs.nanolett.0c03993.


[3] Z Zhang et al., Appl Phys Lett 118 (2021) htps://doi. org/10.1063/5.0029979.


[4] BK Miller and PA Crozier, Microsc Microanal 19 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1017/S1431927612014122.


[5] M Picher et al., Ultramicroscopy 150 (2015) https://doi. org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2014.11.023.


[6] D Shindo et al., J Electron Microsc 58 (2009) https://doi. org/10.1093/jmicro/dfp018.


44 www.microscopy-today.com • 2021 September 126


(2004), https://www.nist.gov/pml/x-ray-mass-attenuation- coefficients.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80