www.bifa.org


News


BIFAlink


FMC to review ‘costly and unfair’ demurrage and detention fees


“Ocean carriers have made ‘free-time’


Proposed changes to FMC demurrage and detention fees include suspending charges in cases where shippers and their 3PLs are prevented from moving cargo out of terminals by factors beyond their control


The US Federal Maritime Commission (FMC) is backing proposals aimed at reforming how demurrage and detention fees are levied by ocean carriers on shippers. The main change would be that charges would be suspended in cases where shippers and their 3PLs are prevented from moving cargo out of terminals by factors beyond their control. Following an 18-month investigation into the


topic by FMC commissioner Rebecca Dye, the FMC has announced that it has formally adopted her recommendations.


Interpretive rule Ms Dye proposed the FMC adopts an “interpretive rule that clarifies how the commission will assess the reasonableness of demurrage and detention practices”. She said in a letter to the commission: “The rule flows from the longstanding principle that practices imposed by tariffs, which are implied contracts by law, must be tailored to meet their intended purpose. “In the case of demurrage and detention


charges, the purpose is to act as financial incentives to cargo interests to retrieve cargo and return equipment.


October 2019


[demurrage, detention, per diem] penalties a major cost for importers and exporters and their truckers, often threatening to lock out truckers who do not immediately pay and making shippers’ protest/challenges extremely difficult. “Virtually all shippers have been assessed


these penalties, ranging from $125/ to as high as $325/container per day. Some AgTC members have had millions of dollars of these penalties imposed, even when delay was not their fault, due to closed terminals, congestion in the terminals, delays at terminal gates, Customs inspections, etc,” it added.


“These financial incentives operate to ensure


that cargo interests do everything customarily required to be positioned to retrieve cargo and return equipment within the time allotted. “Absent extenuating circumstances, however,


when incentives no longer function because shippers are prevented from picking up cargo or returning containers within time allotted, charges should be suspended. “Focusing on this incentive principle and cargo


availability and supporting innovations such as a ‘push notice’ of container availability, will improve port performance and overall freight delivery system effectiveness,” she added. The proposal has been welcomed by at least


one major shipper body, the Agricultural Transportation Coalition (AgTC), which represents the vast US food exporting industry. “This is a long-awaited step forward to address one of the most costly and unfair burdens imposed by ocean carriers on shippers,” AgTC said.


Pinch point The issue of demurrage and detention at terminals on the US west coast was thrown into sharp relief earlier this year when port congestion mounted as importers desperately tried to bring cargo into the country ahead of the implementation of new tariffs on Chinese goods. Other proposals from Ms Dye include the


establishment of a shipper advisory board to report on how FMC policies are affecting US importers and exporters, as well as the continued support of the Memphis Supply Chain Innovation Team, which is currently working on a project to “improve chassis availability at the railheads in that city via the establishment of a ‘grey pool’ of equipment”.


BIFA is grateful to The Loadstar for permission to reproduce this article, originally published on Theloadstar.com


17


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24