search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
VISA CRISIS


DON’T MENTION THE V WORD


David Woodd, Chief Executive of the Hurlingham Polo Association, writes exclusively in this Yearbook on the current visa crisis and what is being done behind the scenes to ensure the continuity of the sport. PICTURES BY IMAGES OF POLO


P


olo is close to being unique in that it is a competitive pro-am sport with some teams pro heavy, others pro light, a few all pro and a good number all amateur, especially at the lower levels. Those professional players who need a visa to play here are subject to the same Home Office criteria as other sports, namely, they must be recognised as an international sports person of the highest level and must be playing the sport in this country at the highest level and can only take supplementary employment at that level for a limited number of hours per week. As far as polo is concerned, the level rather than the hours is the issue While between 2004 and 2016, only one licence was suspended, in October 2016 the Home Office suspended all those it visited – a total of 15 – plus the Hurlingham Polo Association (HPA) as the endorsing body. The Home Office then decreed that visas would only be given to players five goals or above playing the high-goal (18 goals and above) and that visas would only be granted to those grooms working for those players. During initial negotiations with the Government, conducted by the HPA and aided by the Federation of International Polo (FIP), the five goals handicap was reduced to four goals for players and 18 to 15 goals for the minimum level of play. In addition, and just as crucially, grooms were allowed visas if working for those playing the medium- and high-goal. Nevertheless, it quickly became clear this was unworkable. Hence, the importance of educating those in positions of influence, within Parliament and the Civil Service is vital. So, in October 2017, at the instigation of Robert de By and


Chancellor of the Exchequer 30 Robert de By and the


Siobhan Barney (both members of Guards Polo Club) an All-Party Parliamentary Group (APPG) for polo was created with the help of and under the Chairmanship of the Rt Hon John Whittingdale OBE, MP, a former Secretary of Digital, Culture, Media and Sport. Last summer this APPG, along with Robert and Siobhan, who have been instrumental in providing access and information to key ministers, attended the final of the 2018 Cartier Queen’s Cup to help improve these influential MPs’ understanding of the sport. The day was considered a success and it is hoped to be the first of many such visits. Of course, many MPs have been and are


supportive, but John Whittingdale’s strong advice to the HPA has been consistent: “Work quietly behind the scenes to gain the support of MPs by producing hard facts, such as an Economic Impact Assessment,


THE IMPORTANCE OF EDUCATING THOSE IN POSITIONS OF INFLUENCE, WITHIN PARLIAMENT AND THE CIVIL SERVICE, IS VITAL


and be wary of publicity”. Unfortunately, there is little support for polo amongst the wider electorate and MPs may not appreciate being listed as a champion of a game perceived by many to be elitist and played mainly by the very wealthy. The APPG Chair was also emphatic that individual campaigns tend to confuse rather than help. After further negotiations by the HPA and meetings with ministers by Robert de By, including with the Immigration Minister the Rt Hon Caroline Nokes in November of last year, the last in a series of concessions for 2017-2019 was granted enabling players with a minimum of four goals to come and play medium-/high-goal and grooms to come in for all levels of players and all levels of play again for 2019.


At a subsequent meeting in Buenos Aires, Argentina, in December 2018, representatives of the HPA, the Argentine Polo Association (AAP) and the English and Argentine players’ associations agreed that the immediate priorities should be:


• Seek an agreement to allow, as a trial, non- EEA players with a valid visa for 15-goal and above to play 12- and 8-goal polo with their employers in the 2019 season • Engage with the Home Office to develop an application process for appropriately qualified non-EEA polo players to work with clubs in the UK in 2020 to coach and help to develop the game at grassroots level


I am delighted to report that the first bullet has been met and that the Home Office has agreed to discuss the second this June. Prior to that, a working group, which will include a representative from Guards Polo Club, Cowdray Park, the AAP and the English and Argentine players’ associations, will meet to consider how this could work best and look at any other visa issues.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176  |  Page 177  |  Page 178  |  Page 179  |  Page 180  |  Page 181  |  Page 182  |  Page 183  |  Page 184  |  Page 185  |  Page 186  |  Page 187  |  Page 188  |  Page 189  |  Page 190  |  Page 191  |  Page 192  |  Page 193  |  Page 194  |  Page 195  |  Page 196  |  Page 197  |  Page 198  |  Page 199  |  Page 200  |  Page 201  |  Page 202  |  Page 203  |  Page 204  |  Page 205  |  Page 206  |  Page 207  |  Page 208  |  Page 209  |  Page 210  |  Page 211  |  Page 212  |  Page 213  |  Page 214  |  Page 215  |  Page 216