Grant fundraising

‘Look for problems or challenges that affect your potential beneficiaries and describe how your project will help address these’

eligibility, and it’s possible to do so, try to speak directly to the funder.

Not providing information that is requested Some funders ask for a lot of information up front to help them assess your school’s eligibility. This includes personal contact details, financial information and supporting documents such as copies of safeguarding policies or governing documents. Some funders perform fraud checks, so they will not review an application if certain information is withheld. It is a good idea to check what information is required at the very beginning of your application journey. Are you able to supply the information? Can you get the information together in time for submission?

Not answering application questions correctly This is often down to not reading the question carefully enough and assuming what the funder wants to know. A good example of an application question that is often answered incorrectly is this one: ‘What do you want funding for?’ I have read many applications where the applicant dives in by describing the school in terms of its vision, values and pedagogical approach – taking up valuable writing space and failing to actually specify what their project is about. To give a compelling answer to this question, you should describe how you would spend the grant, how your project would work, who would benefit and who would be involved in its delivery. I would definitely check the guidance notes, because some funders provide key pointers on how to answer each question.

34 SPRING 2019 FundEd

Over-reliance on statistics in applications The use of statistics in an application can be a powerful way to convey the need for your project. However, many applicants simply present statistics without any explanation of their significance. This can mean that reviewers are faced with paragraphs full of figures but little detail about what they mean. To avoid falling into this trap, try asking yourself ‘so what?’ every time you use a statistic in your application. For example, so what if your school is located in an area of high deprivation? What does this mean for people living in the area? How does it affect the everyday lives of children in your care? How will your project address the challenges experienced by local people because of these circumstances?

Not providing a strong enough case for support Grant funding is competitive. You need to present a compelling case so that the funder chooses to support your school. One pitfall to avoid is using circular reasoning in your application. To give you an example, let’s say you’re bidding for funding for a new multi-use sports area. You say that your project is the problem and the answer to the problem rolled into one - i.e. the fact that you don’t have a sports area is the reason you need one. This will fail to impress a reviewer. Instead, look for problems or challenges that affect your potential beneficiaries and describe how your project will help address these. If we take the multi-use sports area example again, it might be that local children have low activity levels and poor uptake of sports outside of school, which

might affect their health and physical confidence. You could then describe how your project would address this. Always communicate need, urgency and impact.

Not thinking about the future What will happen when the grant has been spent? Do you have a plan in place to sustain the project or build a legacy? If so, it is a good idea to make this clear to the reviewer. This will give them confidence that their grant will have lasting impact.

The money is gone There is very little you can do about this one. Sometimes the money for a given cycle or programme has already been allocated by the time your application is reviewed. Don’t despair. Try to find out if you need to resubmit your application and when applications will next be reviewed. Put this date in your diary and be ready to impress the reviewer.

Further reading Visit to read more of Rachel's invaluable advice on bid writing and how to make your grant application stand out from the crowd.

Rachel Gordon runs the School Funding Service, which helps schools across the UK win grants for a wide range of projects, from playgrounds and sports equipment to after- school clubs and extended services. She writes bids for schools and advises them on how to maximise their funding potential. For details, visit

Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60