search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
news Independents join Deals Awards judging panels


A survey by The Business Magazine of corporate finance specialists in the south has led to some key changes to the Deals Awards nomination and judging process from 2019


With nominations already being canvassed for the Thames Valley Deals Awards, the changes will ensure that a broader range of opinions help guide the process of determining finalists and winners for each category.


The two events for 2019 are:


Thames Valley Deals Awards Madejski Stadium, Reading – April 4, 2019


Solent Deals Awards Hilton at the Ageas Bowl, Southampton – May 23, 2019


Awards chairman David Murray: “The Deals Awards have been running for a decade, and have a reputation as the best-attended and most eagerly-anticipated corporate finance events in the region.


“It has always been the case that sponsors have been involved in judging – specifically because they have the intimate knowledge of the deals environment to make informed decisions. However, there have been requests to open up the judging to more independents – to ensure that a broader range of views can help the panel reach the best decisions. To that end, from 2019, the panel will include a number of independent judges. I’m delighted that we already have names confirmed.”


These include Angela Lane, who qualified with PwC, had 18 years in private equity with 3i, and who now is chairman of the audit committee at Dunedin Enterprise Investment Trust plc, as well as having a number of non-exec director roles; David Henderson, former CEO of a UK private bank, and an experienced non-exec director/chairman from the financial services industry; Peter Jacobs, senior adviser with Apiary Capital, and former partner of Primary Capital; and Nigel Vaughan who has had over thirty years of international board-level experience in both an executive and non-executive capacity across a wide selection of businesses in the south.


“All four are tremendously experienced and will add greatly to the judging process. We plan to announce more names soon,” said Murray.


He added: “Those who have attended our judging panel in the past will know the care we have taken to reach fair decisions. Whenever a judge has an interest in a specific category he/she has to leave the room. However, there can be a perception that sponsor judges exert too much influence – so increasing the number of independents will put that argument to rest.”


In addition, the organisers and judges are encouraging a wider base of nominations – particularly in categories such as bank and non-bank lender – to ensure that the panel considers the broadest range of firms and deals. This process will begin this month (November).


Murray added: “The success of the Deals Awards depends on the support of the corporate finance community – coupled with our reputation for integrity and ‘fair play’.”


Companies and management teams


For the first time this year, at the Solent event, the Management Teams were highlighted (and interviewed) as part of the ‘show’. This will continue as we focus increasingly on the companies and managements that are the beneficiaries of the professional advice and funding.


THE BUSINESS MAGAZINE – NOVEMBER/DECEMBER 2018


To that end, the targets and acquirers will be encouraged to give their verdicts on the deals and quality of advice received.


Awards categories Following feedback from our corporate finance contacts across the region, we have added a new Banker of the Year category, and introduced a Non-Bank Lender award.


The 2019 categories are: • Bank of the Year • Banker of the Year • Private Equity Firm • Non-Bank Lender • Law Firm • Lawyer • Corporate Finance Team • Corporate Finance Adviser • Young Dealmaker (under 35) • Due Diligence Team • Management Team • Small Deal of the Year • Mid-Range Deal of the Year • Large Deal of the Year


Nomination forms


These are deal awards – so the nomination form should include as much detail on a deal as practical. Testimonials from the target and/or acquirer company add further validity to the nomination and should be solicited where possible.


Nominations for teams and individuals should be detailed – and include supplementary evidence.


Judges will discount large volumes of self-nominations. They will also discount nominations where a lender has simply increased a facility for a customer/client. Where funding is an integral part of an M&A transaction, or significant enough to facilitate a company’s growth strategy, this will be allowed.


Murray stressed: “As there are independent judges for 2019, it is key that the nomination form includes enough detail to allow an independent to make an informed decision.”


Judging process


The closing date for nominations has been brought forward by two weeks to allow a fortnight for the judges to study the entries and do their due diligence.


Judging on the night


To prevent ‘fixing’ whereby a particular vote on the night is skewed by the number of tables a firm has booked, the vote for each of three Deals categories will be, from 2019, 70% judging panel and 30% votes on the night.


news from our website ... For daily business news updates from across the region


Stay informed businessmag.co.uk businessmag.co.uk 5


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88