search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Animal health


The FECPAKG2 is easy to use on farm and in the field


tomers want to hear,” argues Mr Brocklehurst.


“It makes sense that regular FEC testing and an informed approach to treating stock will support a more effective worm- ing programme and reduce in- effective wormer usage. That is exactly what the R&D project re- vealed.”


Hefty losses


Some 84% of farmers involved were revealed as using ineffective wormers, resulting in estimated losses of £12 per lamb. If reflect- ed across the flock, this equates to £12,000 per year for the average Sainsbury’s lamb producer. The study assessed the effec-


FionaLovatt and Eurion Thomas


Parasite management boosts health and performance


I Lubratec® Stabidoor Contact:


HUESKER Ltd. www.huesker.co.uk Tel: 01925 629 393 info@huesker.co.uk


Lubratec® Curtains


ntroducing the latest on-farm technology to manage para- sites could lead to gains of up to £12 per lamb – while also re- ducing reliance on wormers, sug- gests a study.


The Sainsbury’s and Techion collaborative R&D project shows that the targeted use of wormers can improve animal performance by increasing lamb growth rates, while reducing input costs and supporting sustainable worm- ing practices. Sainsbury’s agricultural man- ager for lamb John Brocklehurst told last month’s NSA Sheep 2018 event that the adoption of new technology is critical for producers who want to help deliver a more sustainable lamb supply chain.


A strong, lasting connection


Effective wormers “More accurate control of worm burdens is an area where clear gains can be achieved. The use of innovative technology offers increased lamb output and im- proved animal health and wel- fare alongside cost savings and is a win-win for producers and consumers alike. “Technology that also offers a positive food story on wormer use reduction – akin to the work the industry has done in reducing antibiotic use – is what our cus-


48 ANGLIA FARMER • AUGUST 2018


tiveness of FECPAKG2, the latest in image based faecal egg count (FEC) technology. Results high- lighted undetected wormer re- sistance in sheep could be cost- ing Sainsbury’s lamb producers over £10m per year. Independent sheep specialist


Fiona Lovatt, who was involved in the project, says regular FECPA- KG2 testing has a key role in de- livering an effective worming pro- gramme – and can save farmers money in the process.


Better performance “Farmers involved in the project used FECPAKG2 to conduct reg- ular FEC testing. It showed ac- curate treatment of the right an- imals with the right wormer, at the right time significantly im- proved daily liveweight gains (DLWG), while reducing worm- er use by up to 50%.” Eurion Thomas, European op-


erations manager for Techion UK, said the diagnostics platform of FECPAKG2 meant FEC testing was easy to use and could be car- ried out virtually anywhere by an- yone – including on-farm by the farmer.


“Image based, it provides great- er quality control and auditabili- ty, producing rapid results. This is encouraging more frequent test- ing and better decision making at farm level, both in terms of imme- diate worming decisions and long- term flock health planning.” Mr Thomas added: “Findings


from the project demonstrate how accurate testing and diagnosis can increase farmer profitabili- ty, by maximising animal perfor- mance while reducing treatments. This delivers benefits at both farm and supply chain level.”


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76