Industry news

MPs demand greater legal protection for vulnerable tenants in private sector

and harassment from their landlords. It also wants councils to be given extra powers to takeover properties from rogue landlords. MPs on the Housing, Communities and Local


Government Committee say strong measures are needed so tenants can safely make complaints about poor conditions in their homes and demand essential repairs and maintenance works are carried out. In a new report on the private rented sector, the

Committee says there is a ‘clear power imbalance’ in parts of the sector with tenants often unwilling to complain to landlords about conditions in their homes such as excess cold, mould or faulty wiring, for fear of reprisals. They called for more robust penalties to

deal with the worst landlords and for the Government to give local authorities the power to confiscate properties from those committing the most flagrant offences and whose business model relies on the exploitation of vulnerable tenants.

OVERCROWDING During their inquiry, the Committee heard how in some areas up to 25 people could be found living in houses of just three-bedrooms, while some landlords charged rent of up to £500 for a bed in a room with four bunkbeds. Meanwhile the Residential Landlords Association

has responded by saying sufficient regulatory powers already exist and the main problem is that councils lack the resources and in some cases the political will, to take enforcement action where necessary against bad landlords who let down the whole sector.

n influential Select Committee has called for private sector tenants to be safeguarded from retaliatory evictions, rent increases

Last year the RLA conducted a Freedom of

Information exercise across all local authorities in England and Wales to measure enforcement activity over a five-year period, 2012/13 to 2016/17. This found there was a three per cent fall in inspections by councils related to the regulatory standard for private rented housing, known as the Housing, Health and Safety Rating System (HHSRS). There was a seven per cent decrease in the number of Hazard Awareness Notices issued. While the Committee acknowledged the

legislation introduced in recent years to strengthen protections for tenants – including civil penalties of up to £30,000 and banning orders for criminal landlords - the Committee heard that local authorities have insufficient resources to undertake their enforcement duties. MPs want to see stronger powers, harsher fines and a new commitment to cracking down on unscrupulous practices.

POWER IMBALANCE Clive Betts MP, Chair of the Housing, Communities and Local Government Committee, said: "The imbalance in power in the private rented sector means vulnerable tenants often lack protection from unscrupulous landlords who can threaten them with retaliatory rent rises and eviction if they complain about unacceptable conditions in their homes. Local authorities need the power to levy more substantial fines against landlords and in the case of the most serious offenders, ultimately to be able to confiscate their properties. “Such powers are meaningless if they are not

enforced and at the same time councils need more resources to carry out effective prosecutions. Stronger powers, harsher fines and a new commitment to cracking down on unscrupulous practices will go some way towards rebalancing the

Ombudsman slams council after homeless family lived in hotel room for three years

A Bristol family was forced to share a single hotel room for more than three years because of failures in the council’s homelessness system, the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman found. The family was evicted from their private

tenancy flat in early 2014. After asking Bristol Council for help, they had to stay in single hotel rooms with no cooking facilities and frequently had to move at short notice. As a result of mistakes by council staff and failures to properly implement procedures, the family’s housing application

was not registered until March last year. Two of their children have visual impairments

and were being schooled in their hotel room. This led to the council’s children’s services department being involved, but they failed to refer the case to the housing department. The Ombudsman found the council failed to

accept the family’s homelessness application and reportedly tried to charge the family the full cost for storing their belongings while living in a hotel room. In normal circumstances families should

sector and protecting the many thousands of vulnerable residents who have been abused and harassed by a landlord."

The report recommends:

• Tenants need greater legal protections from retaliatory eviction, rent increases and harassment;

• The establishment of a new fund to support local authorities to undertake informal enforcement activities;

• The introduction of new ways of informing tenants and landlords of their rights and responsibilities;

• A requirement for local authorities to publish their enforcement strategies online; and

• A review of legislation relating to the private rented sector aimed at bringing more clarity for tenants, landlords and local authorities.

The report found a significant minority of homes

in the private rented sector are shockingly inadequate. While the proportion of non-decent homes has declined over the last ten years, the absolute number has increased as the sector has grown. The Committee concluded that enforcement of

existing legislation to protect tenants had been far too low with six out of 10 councils not prosecuting a single landlord in their areas in the whole of 2016. RLA Chairman Alan Ward supported much of

the Committee’s findings, but added: “It is vital that Ministers adopt the Committee’s recommendation for the speedy establishment of a new housing court. This key proposal called for by the RLA would improve the speed of and access to justice for tenants and landlords. At present the courts are not fit for purpose when seeking to uphold tenant and landlord rights.”

only be accommodated in hotels for a maximum period of six weeks. Michael King, said the council followed his

recommendations once the investigation began. He said the council found a home for the family within two months of them being placed on the register, which suggested “just how desperate the family’s situation was.” The council apologised for any hurt caused to the

family, and “any failures that led to them living in unsuitable conditions for such a long time”. Their statement added “While we recognise the situation was unacceptable for a family with young children, we do believe that we tried to do our best for the family on a number of occasions.” The case “did not live up to our usual high standards,” but said “the length of time since the application and the difficulties in making meaningful contact with the family” made the case unusual. | HMM May 2018 | 9

Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52