Smoke & fire protection

Fire sprinkler casings – a compliance loophole for LAs and HAs?

Procurement Policy’ (TPP) guidelines and their own sustainability procedures if the plywood casings being used to cover fire sprinkler pipework are not FSC® certified. With LAs and HAs across the UK focusing on


fire protection and tenant safety in tower blocks, many have already started the process of installing fire sprinkler systems in high rise buildings and are using plywood casings to conceal the orange CPVC sprinkler pipework in flats and public areas. As these products are manufactured from

wood, specifiers and contractors should be stipulating that they are FSC® or PEFC certified, required by the government’s TPP as well as the latest edition of the Timber Procurement Advisory Note (TPAN) from Defra. Defra’s guidance on compliance with the TPP

states: Government procurers and their suppliers should have documentary evidence to show the timber supplied is at a minimum from legal and sustainable sources. This evidence should include full chain of custody from the forest source(s) to the end user. Acceptable forest certification schemes provide

this evidence of legal and/or sustainable timber. Suppliers and buyers must check evidence to verify its validity. Approved schemes include the

“...if you don’t know where your timber and paper come

from, you could be part of the problem.” The Forest Stewardship Council (FSC)

2 international certification schemes: Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) and Programme for the Endorsement of Forest Certification (PEFC). In addition, where LAs, HAs, contractor

partners or merchants have their own ‘green’ or sustainable procurement policies in place, using and supplying non-FSC® products will also be contravening these compliance procedures. Encasement’s Managing Director, Martin

Taylor, explained: “The TPP and TPAN guidance exists to encourage and enforce a responsible approach to global environmental issues, such as climate change, illegal de-forestation and the use of sustainably sourced timber.” He added: “Even though there is an obligation

to use FSC certified boxing under TPAN, non- FSC casings are still available in the market, which presents a risk of non-compliance for specification and procurement personnel. Clearly the best way of address this is to tighten the specification clauses and specify only FSC Chain of Custody certified products.” “In our view FSC is the default choice and not

an option,” he continued. “Today, it’s impossible to purchase non-FSC toilet paper, so why should companies still be able to supply fire sprinkler casings that aren’t manufactured from FSC certified materials. We always advise specifiers to avoid the risk of non-compliance and look for the FSC Chain of Custody (COC) certificate number against each product line that is ordered and supplied. If it’s not present on the invoice and delivery note, then it’s probably not FSC. Even

46 | HMM May 2018 |

FSC themselves say that if you don’t know where your timber and paper come from, you could be part of the problem.” For reference, the Forest Stewardship Council

(FSC) procurement Factsheet, recommends the following procedures and checks when purchasing: • Source from an FSC certified supplier. All FSC certified organisations are included within the FSC certificate database at

• Check that the certificate is valid and that it covers the appropriate product categories using the database at

• Specify FSC certified materials when placing your order and let your supplier know that you need them to make an FSC claim on their sale documents.

• Check that the delivery note and/or invoice clearly identifies the FSC certified products and includes the supplier’s FSC certificate code.

01733 266 889

ocal authorities, housing associations and contractor partners could be contravening the UK government’s ‘Timber

Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52