Industry news

Does GREEN have to cost more? G

iven two choices, would a product’s ‘green credentials’ sway a buying decision? For several years, the influencing factor on the

consumer has been cost. However, clients, particularly those working to 30-year asset plans, now need to consider other aspects. Is the cost to the environment becoming one of the most crucial of these? BBC One’s Blue Planet II series (2017) is

immensely popular, with the first episode attracting over 14 million viewers – more than Strictly or X Factor. Narrated by Sir David Attenborough, the programme explores our amazing oceans but also highlights the human impact upon them, particularly the increased use of plastics, in all aspects of daily life, where up to 12 million tonnes per year (Greenpeace, 22 August 2017), ‘ends up in the oceans where it can be lethal’ (David Attenborough). So, what can we do? Is there a way that we can reduce the use of plastics and what will be the cost implications of this choice? In the construction industry there is a perception

that environmentally friendly products are more expensive, and, in some instances, this is true. For example, there is a considerable cost difference in common loft insulation products and that of ‘eco’ sheep’s wool alternatives. Plastic – or PVCu – is the most commonly used material in rainwater products, such as guttering,

and is perceived as the cheapest solution. Plastic guttering is readily available at builders’ merchants and DIY chains. However, there are shortfalls in durability. Firstly, over time there can be issues due to the expanding and contracting of the plastic, causing problems such as warping or leaking and colour fade. Secondly, the expected life is only 15– 25 years, unlike other roofing materials, such as tiles, that are expected to last 50–60 years. Finally, at the end of its functional life, plastic guttering has no scrap value and will become landfill. Metal guttering is a practical alternative. It can be

formed from molten metals, such as aluminium, steel or iron, and properly maintained, could give a functional life of up to 60 years. Most types of metal guttering can be fully recycled, having a viable scrap value. They are sold in lengths and components, in a range of shapes, sizes and profiles and can be produced in any number of colours. When Wembley Stadium was demolished in 2003, 96% of the aluminium was collected and recycled (Aluminium for Futures). However, annual maintenance is required, and

could include washing down, repairing the paint finish and re-jointing. In addition, these products are significantly more expensive than PVCu goods. Mustang® Seamless Aluminium Guttering has all

the benefits of metal rainwater goods but is far closer in price to plastic guttering. It is a unique

system with no joints, meaning no leaks, and has the visual appeal of smooth, neat lines, in a non- fading range of colours. Mustang is environmentally sustainable: manufactured from a minimum of 78% recycled aluminium which can still be recycled at the end of its life, and made to the exact dimensions of the building, eliminating wastage. It is the only aluminium seamless gutter system approved by the construction industry’s accreditation body, BBA, and has a certified life expectancy of 30 years. Drew Robins, ARP Ltd Head of Specification:

“The Mustang Seamless gutter is the environmentally responsible choice, with all the benefits of a metal system, at a price that is within Local Authority and Housing Association budgets. Its accredited life expectancy assists with asset planning, bringing it into line with the life expectancy of other roofing elements.” To request a brochure or any further information

on your specific needs please visit or call 0116 473 5862

Intratone opens all

the right doors

At Intratone we provide the complete all-in-one door entry solution – from the door entry panels to HF receivers, all the way down to our colourful key

fobs. Our systems can be remotely managed from our cloud-based management portal, making life much easier for residents and facilities managers alike.

To fi nd out more go to

16 | HMM May 2018 |

Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52