search.noResults

search.searching

note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Poor Little Rich Dog. by Jon Katz E


rnie, a fluffy, 10-week-old Golden Retriever with heart- melting eyes, was originally a birthday present. The lucky recipient was Danielle, a pony-tailed 11-year-old living in an affluent suburb. Danielle’s passions for some time had been soccer, Justin


Timberlake and instant messaging. Her parents wanted to give her a different kind of birthday gift, “something that you didn’t plug in or watch, something that would give her a sense of responsibility.” She’d often said she’d love a puppy and vowed to take care of it. Girl and dog, growing up


together—what parent hasn’t pictured it? Her folks envisioned long family walks around the neighborhood, Ernie frolicking on the lawn while they gardened. They could see him riding along to soccer games. Acquiring a dog completed


the portrait that had been taking shape for several years, beginning with the family's move to the suburbs. The package included a four-bedroom colonial, a lawn edged with flowering shrubs, a busy sports schedule, a Volvo wagon and a Subaru Outback to ferry the kids around. A dog – a big, beautiful hunting breed – came with the rest of it, increasingly as much a part of the American dream as the picket fence or the car with high safety ratings. So Danielle’s parents found a breeder online with lots of


awards, cooed over the adorable pictures. They surprised Danielle with the puppy on her birthday, just hours before her friends were due for a celebratory sleepover. It was love at first sight. Danielle and her friends spent hours


passing the adorable puppy from one lap to another. Ernie slept with her that night. Over the next two or three weeks, she spent hours cuddling with him, playing tug of war, and tossing balls while her parents took photos. But the dog did not spark greater love of the outdoors or


diminish her interest in television, iPod, computer, and cell phone. Nor did his arrival slow down Danielle’s demanding athletic schedule; with practices, games, and victory celebra- tions, soccer season took up three or four afternoons a week. Anyway, she didn’t find the shedding, slobbering, chewing, and maturing Ernie quite as cute as the new-puppy version. Both of Danielle’s parents worked and rarely got home


58 THE NEW BARKER


before 7 p.m. on weekdays. The household relied on a nanny/housekeeper who wasn’t especially drawn to dogs and viewed Ernie as stupid, messy, and, as he grew larger and more restive, mildly frightening. Because nobody was home during the day, he wasn’t house-


broken for nearly two months and even then, not completely. No single person was responsible for him; nobody had the time, will, or skill to train him. As he went through the


normal stages of retriever develop- ment – teething, mouthing, racing frantically around the house, pee- ing when excited, offering items the family didn't want retrieved, eating strange objects and then vomiting them up – the casualties mounted. Rugs got stained, shoes chewed, mail devoured, table legs gnawed. The family rejected the use of a crate or kennel –a valuable calming tool for young and energetic dogs – as cruel. Instead, they let the puppy get into all sorts of trouble, then scolded and resented him for it. He was “hyper,” they complained, “wild,” “rambunctious.”The notion of him as annoying and difficult became fixed in their minds;


perhaps in his as well. A practiced trainer would have seen, instead, a Golden


Retriever that was confused, under-exercised, and untrained – an ironic fate for a dog bred for centuries to be calm and responsive to humans. Ernie did not attach to anybody in particular – an essential


element in training a dog. Because he never quite understood the rules, he became increasingly anxious. He was reprimanded constantly for jumping on residents and visitors, for pulling and jerking on the leash when walked. Increasingly, he was isolated when company came or the family was gathered. He was big enough to drag Danielle into the street by now, so her parents and the housekeeper reluctantly took over. His walks grew brief: outside, down the block until he did his business, then home. He never got to run much. Complaining that he was out of control, the family tried


fencing the back yard and putting Ernie outside during meals to keep him from bothering them. The nanny stuck him there most of the day as well, because he messed up the house. Allowed inside at night, he was largely confined to the kitchen, sealed off by child gates.


(Continued on following page.)g www.TheNewBarker.com


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96