search.noResults

search.searching

note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS Growing acceptance of timber


Timber is seeing a strong resurgence across many construction sectors due to sustainability drivers, but obstacles remain. ADF canvasses industry views


timber. Most of this is destined for building sites across the UK, having been selected by architects and specifiers.


E


All three materials are widely used for the structural framework of buildings and all have their strengths. However, when making the choice between different material options, what has not always in the past been considered as part of the decision-making process is the relative environmental credentials of each. As the focus on sustainable building practices becomes increasingly intense, those compar- isons are becoming ever more important to the specifiers in the industry. “Sustainability and environmental consideration have been hot topics in the construction industry for a number of years now,” says Tim Belden, university liaison manager at The Timber Research and Development Association (TRADA). “As an architect, if you’re serious about lowering your impact on the environment and global warming, you should be using timber wherever appropriate; it’s the obvious choice.”


Although this view has been widely adopted in continental Europe, it has failed to catch on in the UK despite the unambiguous findings regarding the carbon footprint of each material. “One tonne of


concrete produces 927 kg of CO2 per tonne of end product – that’s almost a 1:1 ratio,” says Belden. “If we look at steel, dependent on variety, approximately 1.8 tonnes of carbon dioxide is produced for every tonne of end product. These are huge numbers that have a significant impact on our environment.”


The positives of negative footprint


Timber, on the other hand, has a very differ- ent environmental impact. Due to its ability to absorb and store carbon in its fabric,


timber consumes more CO2 than is emitted back into the atmosphere during its processing. Belden continues: “Let’s take cross laminated timber (CLT) for example.


ADF JULY 2017


ach year the UK produces 11 million tonnes of steel, 12 million tonnes of concrete and 11 million tonnes of


For each tonne of product grown, processed, prepared and shipped to site,


300 kg of CO2 is removed from the air. Timber production therefore has a negative carbon footprint, meaning we’re not only protecting the environment, we’re helping to improve it.”


This data comes as no surprise to Stuart


Devoil, head of marketing and brand at timber panel manufacturer MEDITE SMARTPLY, who explains his company’s approach to sourcing timber: “Made from fast-growing softwoods in our own sustainably managed FSC-certified forests in Ireland, our products actually consist of the by-products from timber production.” He continues: “Our timber panels use material that would otherwise be used as fuel or simply disregarded: wood residues, sawmill co-products and pulpwood. Whatever we don’t deem suitable for product manufacture, we use in the genera- tors to power the processing machinery.”


Cost


It’s not just environmental benefits that timber construction materials add to the material choice mix – the projected cost outlook is also becoming increasingly appealing to specifiers. Belden says, “While the cost of raw materials in steel and concrete can fluctuate, especially in the case of steel, timber costs remain fairly predictable. With the increased interest in building with timber frame we’re forecast- ing that the price will continue to decrease in the next few years.”


The demand for timber as a construction material has been firmly established with architects and specifiers for many years. However, increased focus on sustainability in the built environment is beginning to turn even more heads. Duncan Baker Brown, director at East Sussex architects BBM Sustainable Design, clarifies: “When we’re working on projects, we want to assess the whole supply chain to understand exactly where our raw materials have come from. The most accessible and eco-friendly product that we can do this with is timber. It’s a material trend that is


IN DEMAND


Demand for timber is growing due to the material’s sustainable attributes, negative carbon footprint and durability


It’s not just environmental benefits that timber construction materials add to the material choice mix


53


WWW.ARCHITECTSDATAFILE.CO.UK


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84