search.noResults

search.searching

note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
CARE HOMES & SHELTERED HOUSING PROJECT REPORT


41


after LGS at 11 weeks, and only required 175 mm party walls. Symmetrys, with assistance from the quantity surveyors PMP, estimated that the additional cost of fireproofing and sound- proofing an LGS frame in this case would have been around £200,000, which Halaria describes as “quite phenomenal.” In addition, there was the weight issue: “Both LGS and CLT frame are very light, but with LGS you are using concrete floors so it’s a heavier frame overall.” And due to the limitations on spans, “there would be a lot of hot rolled steel to get it to work, essen- tially it would become a standard steel frame infilled with LGS.”


Cormac Farrelly is complimentary about Symmetrys’ analytical approach: “The very helpful thing they did was to look at that cost/benefit matrix, which allowed the decision to be made. If you look at the bigger picture, it’s actually cost-neutral.”


Speed & efficiency


Symmetrys identified a further reason why steel frame, despite its familiarity for contractors and ability to provide large spans, wasn’t the ideal solution. The need to bring in a crane would have involved a “high level of site activity in a sensitive local


ADF JUNE 2017


environment.” On other hand, as witnessed recently by Halaria on a CLT housing project in London’s Elephant & Castle by Eurban (Trafalgar Place), fast progress can be made using just a few staff on site. “There was a team of five rapidly putting up a big building, as it’s so efficient.” Farrelly comments: “We wanted CLT for the energy advantages of the material, but also its speed – we could get this thing water-tight really quickly.” He does offer a note of caution however, saying “We’ve used CLT in the past where it has been brought in too late in the day, and there has been a lot of steel thrown in to make the spans work.”


Halaria summarises why CLT finally won out over a twin-wall precast option – weight of precast being one factor, but the deal-breaker being the roof: “The thing with precast is while it would go up as quickly as CLT, the precast units couldn’t span to the ridge to form the roof, so you’d have to bring in steelwork which is another trade on site.” In addition it would have a “significant impact on foundation costs,” costing around an extra £100,000 for foundations and screed according to Symmetrys’ analysis. Even a steel frame with precast floors would have cost an


WWW.ARCHITECTSDATAFILE.CO.UK


ROOMS WITH A VIEW


As well as providing more space than normal and great views, apartments also have a sense of enclosure and are shaded by the balconies above


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92