MESSAGE FROM THE PRESIDENT ASC Payment Reform Deserves Bipartisan Support


ate last year, Congress adopted two important measures that ASCA and ASCs had been supporting for some time ( While we appreciate the congressional support that those provisions received, the work ASCs need to do on Capitol Hill is far from over. As recently as 2003, Medicare reimbursed ASCs at an average of 86 percent of the amount it paid to HOPDs for the same procedures. Today, on average, ASC payments are less than 50 percent of the HOPD rates. At the root of the problem are several Medicare policies that reward HOPDs, the higher cost provider, over ASCs, the lower cost provider. One of those policies, as ASCA has said before, is the formula used to adjust ASC and HOPD payments for inflation each year. ASCs are updated based on the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U), a number derived using a formula that measures the cost of commodities like milk, eggs and gasoline. Hospitals, on the other hand, are updated based on the “hospital market basket.”

Not surprisingly, that number, which measures the rising cost of medical goods and services, has historically resulted in substantially higher reimbursement. Hospitals need to be reimbursed for the many essential services they provide, but the continuing growth in the disparity between Medicare’s HOPD and ASC payments must stop. To remedy this growing inequity, ASCA is backing new legislation that would require Medicare to update ASC payments based on the more appropriate hospital market basket. To read more about the bill introduced on March 30 by US Representatives Devin Nunes (R-CA) and John Larson (D-CT), visit ASCA’s web site. While parts of this legislation are similar to provisions in the ASC Quality and Access Act of 2015, that legislation died at the conclusion of the last session of Congress and new legislation was needed. The new bill ASCA is backing also would create greater transparency in the Medicare quality reporting program for both ASCs and HOPDs by requiring the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), where applicable, to post online, side-by-side comparison reports from both sites of service. It also would add an ASC representative to the Advisory Panel on Hospital Outpatient

Payment. Since decisions made by the panel impact ASC facility fees and the procedures that Medicare will allow ASCs to perform, it is only fair that ASCs have a voice there. Finally, this bill would require CMS to disclose exactly which criteria are involved

Seeking Authors

ASC Focus is seeking the contribution of articles by guest authors. If you have the expertise and time to write for us, we’d be interested in hearing from you.

Please see our editorial guidelines at and submit your story proposal to


when a decision is made not to add a new procedure to the list of procedures that Medicare will reimburse ASCs for providing. Under current policy, CMS can exclude a procedure from this list because of a general concern for up to six criteria but is not required to disclose exactly which of the criteria trigger the exclusion. This process makes it difficult for ASCs to marshal the data needed to respond to any concerns that CMS may have and slows the advance of new procedures to this lower cost site of care. As Democrats and Republicans continue to face off in the national debate regarding Obamacare and the many other areas of concern that are inherent in our complicated web of national health care policy, these proposals demonstrate that there are still plenty of health care reforms that can and should be implemented with bipartisan support.

Rebecca Craig, RN, CASC President of ASCA’s Board of Directors


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30