Just Say No to Big Brother’s Smart Meters by Orlean Koehle
Such a plan to micromanage people’s lives is the hallmark of a Marxist-Socialist, or Corporate-Fascist state, and it has no place in a free society.”
Lloyd Morgan, from Berkeley, a retired electronics engineer, and Senior Director of the Environmental Health Trust, who was one of the presenters at the Commonwealth Club’s seminar on “The Health Effects of Electromagnetic Fields,” held November 18, 2010, (of which you will read in this same chapter): His business card says that he is also the Director of the “Central Brain Tumor Registry of the United States.” He told me before the meeting that it takes about 30 years latency for the brain tumors to develop from radiation exposure, but that could be much faster with the constant use of cell phones, especially held close to the ear. He said in his testimony “that the federal health standards are ridiculous. The peak density of the smart meters is actually 2000 x higher than their minimal standards. He also said that the PG&E controls the CPUC. This must stop!”
Sarah Riley, who is a health care practitioner, has seen the effect of EMF and RF on others and is hypersensitive, herself. She is constantly sick from the exposure to these emissions. She has heart palpitations, headaches, nausea.
Larry Bragman, an attorney and the mayor of Fairfax, one of the cities that has a moratorium stopping Smart Meters from being installed. They passed their moratorium October 4, 2010. He said that there is a report coming from the California Department of Science and Technology due this month of December. He asked the Commission to wait on their decision until after they see this report. He also reminded them that EMF sensitivity is a protected condition under the Disabilities Act.
Nancy Hoover is very EMF sensitive. She said that Smart Meters’ RF are a different exposure. They are much worse than any other Wi-Fi. She does not have a smart meter herself, but she is being affected by the one coming from her neighbor. She gets severe headaches. She put a metal wheelbarrow over their smart meter and then she did not have the symptoms. But once it was removed she got the headaches again.
Alan Horne, from Sebastopol, one of the cities that have been discussing a moratorium in their city council, and, as yet, it is not being “deployed” by Smart Meters. He was trained in RF radiation during the Vietnam War as a military weapon. He knows how deadly it can be, so does the military.
David Hubert, also from Sebastopol: He has a background in psychology and
environmental science. He said that 1,200,000 people in California are hypersensitive to EMF. The number is growing.
Karen Hudson, also from Sebastopol: She is a former public school teacher, a cancer survivor, who is very EMF sensitive. She said that DNA is affected by the EMF and RF radiation. Pulsed radiation at any strength is worse than a constant frequency and that is the kind of radiation given out by Smart Meters.
She spoke of the scientists who
presented information at the Commonwealth Club, Nov. 18. One of them said that “Smart Meters are the atomic bomb of radiation.” Industry can’t hide behind their own false tests anymore. The truth is coming out.
Katharina Sandizell of Pt. Reyes. They got 600 signatures on a petition in their small town against Smart Meters. She and others are chasing the Wellington trucks out of town when they come to install the meters. She feels it is her responsibility to protect her
32
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132 |
Page 133 |
Page 134 |
Page 135 |
Page 136 |
Page 137 |
Page 138 |
Page 139 |
Page 140 |
Page 141 |
Page 142 |
Page 143 |
Page 144 |
Page 145 |
Page 146 |
Page 147 |
Page 148 |
Page 149 |
Page 150 |
Page 151 |
Page 152 |
Page 153 |
Page 154 |
Page 155 |
Page 156 |
Page 157 |
Page 158 |
Page 159 |
Page 160 |
Page 161 |
Page 162 |
Page 163 |
Page 164 |
Page 165