Just Say No to Big Brother’s Smart Meters by Orlean Koehle
undercharging customers. The companies also say that the smart meters comply with federal safety standards and that the amount of radiation they give off is comparable to what cell phones, microwave ovens and other common household devices emit. As installations continue, a spokesperson for PG&E says the utility is "evaluating options" for customers who say they don't want smart meters. That possibility comes too late for Salada, who complained to the public-utilities commission
but was told that it could find no obvious error in her bill. "We eventually had to move because we couldn't pay the utility bills," she says. "Now I have a $9,000 bill on my credit report." (Read more:
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,2040176,
00.html#ixzz1CgNB9PMi.)
PG&E Finally Admits before a State Senate Committee that the
SmartMeters have Many Problems in Accuracy – Some 43,000! According to an ABC Channel 7 TV news story that appeared on KGO “7 on Your Side,” San Francisco, April 26, 2011, representatives from PG&E appeared before the Senate Select Committee on the Smart Grid, and finally admitted to some major problems with the SmartMeters – in fact, some 43,000 problems. PG&E's senior vice president of customer relations, Helen Burt, at first told the committee, "We have found eight meters out of the 8.5 million meters that we installed where there is an issue with the actual meter accuracy." The Truth Finally Comes Out: Under intense questioning from Sen. Dean Florez, D-Kern
County, it appears there is a very different story. PG&E finally confirmed that more than 43,000 of its SmartMeters have suffered from various problems. For example, 9,000 of its SmartMeters have not communicated energy usage back to PG&E, more than 11,300 SmartMeters simply failed to work and another 23,000 SmartMeters were installed improperly. Florez stated, "This progress report tells me that you have increasing amounts of failure rates in every one of your categories that's going up, whether it's electric meters, whether it's gas meters, you name it," says Florez. After the hearing, Burt told the KGO reporter that the billing of those 43,000 SmartMeters could have been impacted: "The problems sometimes do impact the accuracy of the billing that comes from those meters, but they're not the meter’s accuracy per se.” Moratorium Asked for Against the Meters: Mark Toney, executive director for TURN, The
Utility Reform Network, has been calling for a moratorium on the installation of more SmartMeters until an independent investigation can be completed. He called Monday's testimony by PG&E significant. PG&E is finally admitting for the first time that tens of thousands of its meters are not working properly, are not giving proper readings, and there are bills that they have to estimate and this is a really big problem. Estimated Bills? PG&E said some customers with SmartMeters have received estimated bills
for three months straight because of various issues. However, Burt said the number who received estimated bills was less than customers still using traditional analog meters. PG&E has begun to do side-by-side testing so it can compare the old meters to the new SmartMeters. It also says it will soon leave the old meters installed even after SmartMeters are put in. "In the summer time, we're going to start keeping our customers' traditional meters so should they have a question, we can go back and test it and know that it was their meter," says Burt. The executive director of the California Public Utilities Commission says the commission has now received just under 1,000 consumer complaints about SmartMeters. That is up from 600 reported complaints as of March 15.
Related Content: Story: Local company stands behind SmartMeter accuracy; Story: Texas utilities admit billing errors with SmartMeters; Story: CPUC hires independent firm to review SmartMeters; Story: Delays plague PG&E SmartMeter investigation; Story: Are SmartMeters easy targets for hackers?; Story: PG&E under fire from angry
6
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132 |
Page 133 |
Page 134 |
Page 135 |
Page 136 |
Page 137 |
Page 138 |
Page 139 |
Page 140 |
Page 141 |
Page 142 |
Page 143 |
Page 144 |
Page 145 |
Page 146 |
Page 147 |
Page 148 |
Page 149 |
Page 150 |
Page 151 |
Page 152 |
Page 153 |
Page 154 |
Page 155 |
Page 156 |
Page 157 |
Page 158 |
Page 159 |
Page 160 |
Page 161 |
Page 162 |
Page 163 |
Page 164 |
Page 165