Just Say No to Big Brother’s Smart Meters by Orlean Koehle


remained relatively obscure until 1979 when Margaret Thatcher became the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom. Courtney’s article explains that Thatcher desired respect and followed the advice of Sir Crispin Tickell, depopulation advocate and UK ambassador to the UN. He pointed out that she could gain international credibility if she promoted the global warming (GW) deception because most politicians are scientifically illiterate (Thatcher holds an undergraduate degree in chemistry). The benefits to the Thatcher Administration GW policies were:


* GW fear was used to weaken US power- if all other countries enacted carbon taxes and industrial reductions they could pressure and gain benefit over the US. * Thatcher belonged to the Conservative Party that held a grudge against the National Union of Mineworkers who were blamed for the Party’s prior defeats, so GW provided an excuse shut down many coal mines and eliminate the miners’ political power. * Nuclear energy emits no carbon dioxide (CO2), and many coal plants were replaced with nuclear power plants. Nuclear power, which presents its own risks, was 4 times as expensive as coal-fired electricity. * The new nuclear power plants were necessary to produce nuclear weapons. Thatcher established the Hadley Centre for Climate Prediction and Research, the operating agency for the UN IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). Hadley is located at East Anglia University, the focal point of the ‘Climategate’ scandal. (http://www.infowars.com/un-tricks-and-treaties/.)


The following gives more information on the Climategate scandal. It comes from my book By Stealth and Deception, USA Transformation and Its Parallel to the European Union, published in May of 2010, pp.177-178. (It can be ordered from www.xlibris or at www.Amazon.com or by calling the author at 707-539-8393.)


Global Warming Lies Exposed: In what has become known as “Climategate,” the global warming hot-air balloon of lies and exaggerations had a big whole punched in it, November 23, 2009, just a few weeks before the UN Copenhagen Climate Change Summit was to begin, December 7. Some computer hackers were able to discover thousands of e-mails that had been sent between several two important science professors that crucial data refuting the global warming theories had been hidden and not allowed to be published. UK Professor Dr. Phil Jones, of the University of East Anglia, headed up the prestigious Climatic Research Unit, which was the main source of information for the UN Intergovernmental Panel (IPPC) and for the world media on climate change.” Jones had corresponded mainly with a professor at Penn State in Pennsylvania, Michael Mann, the creator of the deceptive “hockey stick” graph. USA News, December 1, 2009, reports Penn State is investigating Michael Mann’s participation in “cooking the books” on global warming data as well. Michael was told by Jones to “delete certain E-mails” and hide valuable scientific facts that did not support the global warming theory.


In an e-mail back in 2004, Jones wrote that he and his assistant would keep the true


information out of the next IPCC report, “even if we have to redefine what the peer- review literature is.” There were many similar e-mails. Jones has since stepped down from his position at East Anglia. I was in hopes that this scandal would put a big hole in the “hot air” emitted by international wind bags at the Copenhagen Climate Change Summit that took place starting December 7, but they did their best to ignore it and went right on promoting their scare tactics trying to get all the nations to agree to more draconian restrictions on energy and redistribution of wealth, taking from the wealthier nations to give to the poorer ones.


104


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165