This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
SYNTHETIC SURFACES It’s essential that maintenance


can also be inspected to determine whether any repairs or even replacements need to be made.


What are the cost implications? To maximise the return on current facilities and make budgets stretch further, pitch resurfacing could be a preferred choice for facility owners and operators who are faced with reductions in public spending and ongoing rises in overheads. By replacing your pitch, interest within the facility can be renewed – bringing an in- creased revenue stream through increased usage of the pitch.


How long will a resurfacing project take? The project duration for the replacement of a synthetic turf pitch surface can range from three to five weeks – depending on the actual specification and level of replacement. This time will increase if the surface shockpad or other refurbishment up- grades are required.


is undertaken regularly to ensure optimum playing performance, pitch longevity, safety and appearance


How do you ensure a newly resurfaced pitch lasts another lifespan?


The life expectancy of the surface will depend on the mainte- nance and how intensively it is played on. It is essential that maintenance is undertaken regularly to ensure optimum playing performance, pitch longevity, safety and appearance. The pitch contractor will always provide specific maintenance instructions. Further guidelines, which could help to maximise the surface’s lifespan can be found in the SAPCA Code of Practice for The Maintenance of Synthetic Surfaces via www.sapca.org.uk.


CASE STUDY ALDENHAM SCHOOL


ollowing advice from a specialist synthetic surface maintenance company and a subsequent pitch inspection, Alden- ham School in Hertfordshire decided to replace its existing sand-filled syn- thetic sports turf surface. The original surface had become slippery where the sand in-fill was contaminated and it was starting to hold water. Joints in the existing surface also required repairs and the surface pile height had deteriorated greatly in recent years.


F


After visiting various reference sites, the school chose the Interna- tional Hockey Federation-accredited TigerTurf Evolution surface, which it had observed at Imperial Col- lege’s Harlington sports ground. The surface was chosen on the basis of being excellent for hockey, useable for tennis and five-a-side football and extremely hard-wearing and long-lasting.


Once McArdle Sport-Tec had re- moved the existing surface, the company checked the levels and the integrity of the underlying shockpad and found this still within guidelines set out by SAPCA and Sport England, before installing the new surface. The project was carried out to a tight programme during the school’s Easter holiday and was completed ahead of schedule – allowing the school to use the pitch when the chil- dren returned for the summer term.


CASE STUDY The 3G surface had to perform well for both football and hockey use at the facility LANCASHIRE FA L


ancashire FA’s sand-filled synthetic grass pitch at its county ground had performed well since it was originally constructed by Thornton Sports in 1997. However, after 14 years of continuous use, the full-size pitch was showing signs of wear and tear and no longer provided the standard of playing surface required. The Lancashire FA was looking for a 3G surface that would perform well for their coach education and referee cours- es, while being suitable for use by local hockey clubs.


Thornton Sports’ UK manufac- tured SoccerTurf 40M surface met both these requirements; approved by the


62 Read Sports Management online sportsmanagement.co.uk/digital


International Artificial Turf Standard (IATS) for football use and the Interna- tional Hockey Federation (FIH) for local and regional league competitions. The re-surfacing process involved remov- ing the existing surface and disposing of it in a safe and sustainable manner. The existing shock-pad was then inspected, and necessary repairs were carried out before the new synthetic surface was laid. Finally, a sand and rubber infill was ap- plied which, in this case, was automated by a specialist Sandmatic machine to en- sure a consistent infill level.


The pitch re-construction works and the building of a new five-a-side facility, were completed in just five weeks.


Issue 4 2011 © cybertrek 2011


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84