Packaging, Protection and Pallets Health & Safety
Safely wrapped
Paul Laidler, business director for machinery safety at TÜV SÜD Product Service, a global product testing and certification organisation, says it is vital that health and safety practices around palletisers are solid.
T
he Health and Safety Executive recognises palletisers as a class of machine that require particular attention. Most palletiser- related injuries occur when people enter the machine and are trapped between its many parts. As palletisers transport a heavy and bulky load, operators are also exposed to potential hazards from loads falling off the moving pallets. Due to the size of palletisers, if they are not appropriately guarded, full body access within a machine is a common occurrence. This means that personnel can be in the machinery without the knowledge of those outside and it might be re-started with severe consequences. It is therefore essential that guards are of the correct dimensions to stop people getting under or over them. The height of distance guards must therefore be selected using Table 2 of EN ISO 13857 ‘Safety of machinery - Safety distances to prevent hazard zones being reached by upper and lower limbs’. Where light curtains are in place, which are opto-electronic devices used to safeguard personnel, many assume that operators are fully protected, but we all too regularly see them positioned incorrectly, therefore affording no safety benefit at all. One option to improve safety at entry/ exit points is to use a Captive Key Exchange system, where a mechanical key must
48 March 2014
be removed to isolate the machine and release another key, which the person takes with them into the palletiser. While the key is with the person the machinery cannot be re-started until they return it.
CORRECT STANDARD
The safety standard that should be followed to ensure safety is ‘EN 415-4: Palletisers and Depalletisers’. Originally published in 1997 by CEN, the European Committee for Standardisation, a decision was taken in 2006 to completely revise the Standard, taking into account changes in machinery technology such as the increasingly widespread use of industrial robots. The reasons given for the review also specifically mentioned ‘the additional risks posed by palletising and depalletising systems’, as well as ‘additional measures to minimise the risk of a machine being reset and restarted while someone is inside the machine’. CEN’s aim was to publish the revised version of EN 415-4 by 2011, but it is still under development. This means that while EN 415- 4 had been harmonised to the old Machinery Directive 98/37/EC, when this was replaced by 2006/42/EC on 30 December 2009, it ceased to be a harmonised Standard. This means that technically there isn’t a standard for palletisers and depalletisers. While this means that palletiser owners
www.shdlogistics.com
cannot be prosecuted under EN 415-4, they could still be prosecuted under the Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations (PUWER), or machinery suppliers prosecuted under the Supply of Machinery Regulations, which relates to CE Marking requirements. While we wait for CEN to publish a revised standard, TÜV SÜD’s advice is to continue using the Standard as it remains ‘best practice’, and shows due diligence on the part of the palletiser owner. However, the failures we see on site are often due to a lack of appropriate internal expertise and physical resource to do an in-depth and correct PUWER assessment of all machinery. With palletiser machinery being on such a large and complex scale, the issue of time and expertise availability is further magnified. However, to immediately identify any issues, a thorough PUWER assessment should be completed before new machinery goes into operation. Problems can then be rectified with the manufacturer, so that they or the machinery owner no longer run the risk of a prosecution under the Machinery Directive or PUWER. A decision to ‘make do’ or not invest in the appropriate expertise to run PUWER assessments on palletiser and depalletiser machinery could prove fatal. n
www.tuv-sud.co.uk
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68