This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Fork Lift Trucks Innovation


Lightening the load


A series of product upgrades on Yale counterbalance lift trucks have been introduced, promising exceptional operator visibility, higher productivity and reduced maintenance contributing to lower cost of ownership.


wo new mast designs and a redesigned integral side- shifting fork positioner carriage from NMHG-owned Yale offer businesses a number of benefits which contribute to increased productivity, reduced operator fatigue and lower product and equipment damage. Yale has redesigned its three-stage FFL and two-stage LFL masts to optimise operator visibility and extend service life. The new designs include new chain placement and hose routings to maximise the forward window through which the operator can see the forks as well as the 180° panoramic field of vision. Changes to the design also contribute to increased mast rigidity and hydraulic hose life, extending service intervals and reducing maintenance and repairs over the product’s lifetime.


T INCREASED PRODUCTIVITY


NMHG counterbalance product strategy manager, Mat Allen, comments: “The exceptional operator visibility made possible by the new mast design will lead to increased productivity and driver comfort. The optimised visibility also contributes to


36 March 2014


reducing product and equipment damage. “Mast lowering speeds have also been increased; in product testing two additional full capacity loads were handled every hour. Over the year, this could equate to more than 3,500 loads, a figure that could on its own make a dramatic impact on any operation’s productivity levels.” The new Yale side-shifting fork positioner has been designed for Yale counterbalance fork lift trucks, including the ERP13-15 VC, ERP15-20VT, ERP16- 20VF, ERC16-20VA electric series, and GDP/GLP16-20VX ICE series. The fork spread can be adjusted from a minimum inside dimension of 50mm, allowing specialist tools to be engaged, through the normal load handling requirements, up to a maximum outside edge width of 852mm, providing maximum support for wider loads. Explaining the benefits, Mat Allen said: “Essentially, the main advantage of the Yale side-shifting fork positioner is that it allows the fork spacing to be adjusted from the operator’s compartment, eliminating the need for the operator to manually adjust the forks for different loads. In many mixed load applications,


www.shdlogistics.com


this could be as many as 50-60 times a day. By reducing one of the operator’s physical operations, we are helping to reduce fatigue. The truck’s hydraulics take the strain instead of the operator. “In addition, as the mast capacity of the truck is not affected by the use of the integral side-shift fork positioner, the full capacity load can be handled. This results in an increased capacity of 60kg more per load when compared to the hang-on type of attachment. In an intense application, this could equate to handling 3.6 tonnes more per hour. Based on moving 60 loads an hour, this could equate to 21.6 tonnes per shift; or 108 tonnes a week. “The ergonomic and productivity benefits can be clearly seen. What’s more, the ability to control the fork spread from the driver’s seat also offers substantial time savings in mixed load applications where the operator would normally be manually adjusting the forks for different loads, often several times per shift. This could amount to as much as two-and-a-half hours a week of an operator’s time.” n


www.yale.com


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68