News Email your opinions to
editorial@barkerbrooks.co.uk
Book your place in Manchester. CLAIMS CONFERENCE ➔
'No win no fee' could become history
Te Legal Ombudsman has questioned whether the ‘no win, no fee’ term should be consigned to the history books in a report on complaints about conditional fee agreements (CFAs)
‘N
o win, no fee’ agreements could be under threat after the Legal Ombudsman questioned the use of the popular term for conditional fee agreements (CFAs) in
early January. In a report outlining the complaints received by the
ombudsman on CFAs, the watchdog asks whether the 'no win no fee' descriptor should be used any longer. The ombudsman says that it has become increasingly
concerned about the operation of some firms offering CFAs, after calculating that its has paid out £944,177 in compensation between 1 November 2012 to 30 November 2013. "The ‘no win, no fee’ market has become increasingly
aggressive, with many law firms competing for cases and sometimes prioritising sourcing a large number of customers over a careful selection process," says the report. It also suggests that many personal injury (PI) practices may
be "forfeiting a robust vetting process" in favour of a high risk approach that sees them taking on cases with a low chance of success. The ombudsman says that 70% of complaints on CFAs are related to PI claims. "We are seeing examples of very poor service in some of
the cases that come to us and have made conduct referrals where service providers have failed to honour agreements with customers or have exploited loopholes in the contracts, with serious consequences for their clients," said the watchdog. "These raise questions about the way that such agreements
are structured and sold. There are signs that these cases may be representative of a wider problem with ‘no win, no fee’ agreements which, if unaddressed, may lead to significant market issues arising." The report also refers to the conclusions reached by the
Committees of Advertising Practice (CAP), which described 'no win no fee' as “potentially misleading, because it can imply that the client will be liable for no costs whatsoever”, which has led to the Advertising Standards Agency upholding complaints against firms. The ombudsman has said that it wants to see firms taking the
report seriously and to come up with proposals on how to bring a more uniform level of standards in CFAs across the legal sector. One suggestion made in the report is creating a new code of conduct that would make CFA and DBA follow a typical formula. David Bott, senior partner at Bott & Co, urged the watchdog to
tread carefully over the issue. “There should be no problems using the term 'no-win no-fee'
to describe a service that has no charge if a case is unsuccessful and the client has kept to the terms of the no-win no-fee agreement," he said.
Te three conclusions reached by Te Legal Ombudsman on CFAs:
• The use of ‘no win, no fee’ agreements should be reviewed by regulators to ensure that they do not lead to consumer
detriment
• Firms must take care in explaining the conditions attached to ‘no win, no fee’ agreements and make clear the
circumstances where the customer may end up incurring legal costs
• Lawyers should also exercise due care before agreeing to take on cases to minimise risk to themselves and their clients
Claims Magazine/Issue 11/ 15 "To eliminate the phrase from the vocabulary of legitimate and
ethical law firms because of the behaviour of a minority would be throwing the baby out with the bathwater.” ●
19
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60