This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
LEADING WITH INNOVATION. Application Note


CELL CULTURE MEDIA IDENTIFICATION WITH HANDHELD 1064 NANOMETER RAMAN


1064 NANOMETER HANDHELD RAMAN ANALYZERS PROVIDE INCREASED CAPABILITY FOR CELL CULTURE MEDIA IDENTIFICATION.


Biopharmaceutical production is a growing area of the pharmaceutical industry and cell culture is a key process in the production of many biopharmaceuticals. The cell culture media used for the growth of cells plays an important role in the quality and efficiency of biopharmaceutical production. A non-destructive, reliable, efficient and cost effective method to analyze complex cell culture media is extremely important to ensure high quality process control.


Rigaku’s FirstGuard® A Portable, customizable, handheld Raman analyzer.


Raman spectroscopy is an analytical technique capable of providing highly detailed chemical information about a variety of samples. It is non-destructive, fast and requires little to no sample preparation. Many pharmaceutical companies have adopted Raman spectroscopy as an effective and efficient technique for raw material identification, in-process analysis and final product authentication. Handheld and portable Raman devices are qualifying that incoming raw materials are both the correct material and meet sufficient quality. The USP and EP now recognize Raman spectroscopy as a viable technique for compendial identification.


Fluorescence from cell culture media is a common problem associated with handheld Raman analyzers using 785 nm laser excitation sources. When


present, fluorescence interference is typically orders of magnitude higher than the Raman signal, preventing successful chemical identification and/or analysis. Fluorescence can be significantly reduced via the purposeful selection of a Raman spectrometer’s excitation laser’s wavelength. Four synthetic cell culture media were analyzed with Rigaku Raman FirstGuardTM


Spectrometers using both 785 nm and 1064 nm laser excitations (Figures 1 – 4). The


785 nm spectra show significant fluorescence, making it difficult to obtain reliable and specific information about the sample. In contrast, the 1064 nm spectra show clear Raman peaks that can be used to reliably distinguish different media. Figure 5 shows the Raman spectra from two cell culture media, both of which are versions of a minimum essential medium developed by Harry Eagle, that have only small differences in their components. Clear differences can be seen in these Raman spectra and when a correlation analysis was performed these two media could be accurately and reliably distinguished.


Figure 1. Comparison of 785 nm and 1064 nm excitation Raman spectra of cell cul- ture medium; Minimum Essential Medium developed by Harry Eagle.


Figure 2. Comparison of 785 nm and 1064 nm excitation Raman spectra of cell cul- ture medium; Minimum Essential Medium Eagle Joklik Modification.


Figure 3. Comparison of 785 nm and 1064 nm excitation Raman spectra of cell culture medium; Medium 199.


Figure 4. Comparison of 785 nm and 1064 nm excitation Raman spectra of cell culture medium; Dulbecco Modified Eagle Medium.


Figure 5. 1064 nm laser excitation Raman spectra of two slightly different modifica- tions of Minimum Essential Medium Eagle.


Corporate Headquarters


Boston, MA USA Tokyo, Japan Manufacturing Tucson, AZ USA


Corporate Sales Offices Baltimore, MD USA Hong Kong, China Kauniainen, Finland Munich, Germany


Local distributors worldwide


Rigaku Raman Technologies, Inc. Tel: +1.855.785.1064


Email: sales@rigakuraman.com www.rigakuraman.com/solutions


All Rigaku Raman Technologies products are made in the USA. © 2013 Rigaku Raman Technologies, Inc. All rights reserved. FirstGuard and Xantus are commercial trademarks of Rigaku Raman Technologies, Inc.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92