This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
analysis and opinion Is less more in a Chairman of the Copenhagen Paperless

Lab Forum, Peter Boogaard, shares his perspective


eld in Copenhagen for the first time, the Paperless Lab Forum attracted more than 100 delegates across the two-day event. Organised by Vialis,

the forum continues to be the ideal learning platform for those considering the latest paperless lab initiatives or enhancing their present processes. More than 20 presentations and live demonstrations showed that a paperless laboratory is not a goal in itself, but a result of implementing self-documenting processes. Every time I open a congress I am amazed when I survey the audience and see just how many organisations have yet to implement barcode technology within their daily operations! In almost all other industry segments including chemicals, food and drink, and hospitals, this number is more than 70 per cent; in pharmaceutical laboratories this proven, robust technology seems to be a bridge too far. Te paperless lab is not simply about more

soſtware and hardware technology – it gives users the power and control to implement consistent workflow processes within their organisations. It is about optimising the way we work and enabling new initiatives such as quality by design. Te power of a paperless laboratory is the ability for organisations to implement processes that produce both non- and GxP-compliant documentation, which eliminates unnecessary tasks from the workflow. Many congresses and seminars are

highlighting technologies and soſtware from a technical, functional perspective. Te Paperless Lab forum has a different approach: instead of thinking in product and services roadmap terms, the tone was set to first define why and what people want to establish within their organisations. It is important to identify the overall business objectives before talking about solutions. For example, is it a process improvement to achieve better quality, or to lower the cost of operations? Is it the ability to expand analytical throughput? Overall,


technology is just an enabler to achieve corporate-defined goals. Tis year’s paperless lab forum programme included nine customer case studies and process improvement experiences in the laboratory information arena that can be grouped in three categories: process optimisation; the need for data standardisation; and pragmatic examples of ELN, LIMS and LES deployments.

Process optimisation Renate Dahms presented how Bayer Pharma developed a paperless lab environment by first analysing and modelling the business process in close corporation with the IT and business unit. She showed how a so-called ‘domain model’ was derived from the functional model and the




application architecture that enabled people to look at the processes independent from organisational reality. She described in detail the impact of a multi-moment analysis (MMA), a process which enables clients to measure the real bottlenecks in their workflows. Tis will enable organisations to create a baseline and identify where to optimise their processes, and to be able to define metrics to measure the improvements. Human beings are currently generating

more data than in the previous 5,000 years combined. Crucially, data files without context or meta-data information are meaningless. Martin Lindblad, representing Astra Zeneca, discussed how process intelligence in a large tablet manufacturing site reduces the reduction of waste and scrub, by showing that context is the basis for integrated scientific analysis

paperless laboratory?

and interpretation. Tis is a great user case which is in line with findings I observed and published in the 2013 edition of the Laboratory Informatics Guide (LIG 2013), from the publishers of Scientific Computing World. In my article – ‘When data comes together’ – I shared a pragmatic, paperless QbD example of how an electronic, science-based and pro-active predictive process should retire the ‘aſter- the-fact’ legacy process, CAPA, and change it into a PACA mind-set in life sciences. We have petabytes of data and information in our systems, and almost all vendors and consultancy firms still talk about CAPA to improve quality in the life science industry. It’s time to wake up and leverage cross-industry practices!

Pragmatic examples A complete laboratory setting was shipped from Switzerland to Copenhagen to demonstrate ‘a day in the life of a paperless laboratory’. Te first demonstration, an assay determination of Aspirin using HPLC workflow, showed how a complex analytical workflow can be executed using self-documenting processes without having paper or clerical errors, but with less time spent on documentation. Te second demonstration showed how mobile devices may support daily operations and contribute to the move to a paper-on-glass future. Mobile devices are oſten talked about today as the potential future of lab informatics. Tis demonstration was developed as a think-tank to rethink and potentially reengineer current legacy paper processes, and take advantage of the technologies ahead of us. Customer LES, ELN and LIMS presentations were shown from Christian Hansen (use of ELN in food industry), Active Biotech (use of ECM in a small pharma company), Janssen biologics (Pilot and business case for LES), and LEO Pharma (ELN in a chemistry lab). Finally, Edward Deming’s statement: ‘If you

can’t describe what you’re doing as a process, you don’t know what you are doing’, is starting to resonate. Te scientist is no longer in the lab, but integrated in the overall quality process.

Peter Boogaard is the founder of Industrial Lab Automation. His full report is available at

@scwmagazine l

Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52