This book includes a plain text version that is designed for high accessibility. To use this version please follow this link.
Harvest of commercially exploited fish and shellfish Ecological Objective


Populations of selected commercially exploited fish and shellfish1


are within biologically safe limits, exhibiting a


population age and size distribution that is indicative of a healthy stock


Operational Objectives


Level of exploitation by commercial fisheries is within biologically safe limits


Indicators


Total catch by operational unit2 Total effort by operational unit Catch per unit effort (CPUE) by operational unit


The reproductive capacity of stocks is maintained


Ratio between catch and biomass index (hereinafter catch/biomass ratio). Fishing mortality Age structure determination (where feasible) Spawning Stock Biomass (SSB)


1. The choice of indicator species for collecting information for Ecological Objective 3 should be derived from fisheries targeting species listed in Annex III of Protocol concerning Specially Protected Areas and Biological Diversity in the Mediterranean (species whose exploitation is regulated) and the species in the GFCM Priority Species list (http://www.gfcm.org/gfcm/topic/166221/en). Choice of indicators should cover all trophic levels, and if possible, functional groups, using the species listed in Annex III of SPA and/or, as appropriate the stocks covered under regulation (EC) No 199/2008 of 25 February 2008 concerning the establishment of a Community framework for the collection, management and use of data in the fisheries sector and support for scientific advice regarding the Common Fisheries Policy 2. Operational unit is “the group of fishing vessels which are engaged in the same type of fishing operation within the same Geographical Sub-Area, targeting the same species or group of species and belonging to the same economic segment”


Marine food webs Ecological Objective


Alterations to components of marine food webs caused by resource extraction or human-induced environmen- tal changes do not have long-term adverse effects on food web dynamics and related viability


Operational Objectives


Ecosystem dynamics across all trophic levels are maintained at levels capable of ensuring long-term abundance of the species and the retention of their full reproductive capacity


Normal proportion and abundances of selected species at all trophic levels of the food web are maintained


Indicators


Production per unit biomass estimates for selected trophic groups and key species, for use in models predicting energy flows in food webs


Proportion of top predators by weight in the food webs


Trends in proportion or abundance of habitat-defining groups


Trends in proportion or abundance of taxa with fast turnover rates


Eutrophication Ecological Objective


Human-induced eutrophication is prevented, especially adverse effects thereof, such as losses in biodiversity, ecosystem degradation, harmful algal blooms and oxygen deficiency in bottom waters.


Operational Objectives


Human introduction of nutrients in the marine environ- ment is not conducive to eutrophication


Direct effects of nutrient over-enrichment are prevented


Indicators Concentration of key nutrients in the water column


Nutrient ratios (silica, nitrogen and phosphorus), where appropriate Chlorophyll-a concentration in the water column Water transparency where relevant


Number and location of major events of nuisance/toxic algal blooms caused by human activities1


Indirect effects of nutrient over-enrichment are prevented


Dissolved oxygen near the bottom, i.e. changes due to increased organic matter decomposition, and size of the area concerned2


1. The connection between eutrophication and toxic algal blooms is subject of devoted research at the moment. The connection between the two is not clearly established as not all the ecosystems react in the same way. In fact recent surveys in UK/Ireland in the framework of OSPAR have allowed concluding on the lack of relation between the them and therefore the number and location of major events of nuisance/toxic algal blooms should always be regarded cautiously as an indicator of a direct effect of nutrient over-enrichment. 2. Monitoring to be carried out where appropriate


78


STATE OF THE MEDITERRANEAN MARINE AND COASTAL ENVIRONMENT


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96