Assessment of regional trends in PCBs is made difficult by changes in analytical and reporting methods. At coastal sites in the northwestern Mediterranean (France and Italy), where trend analysis is possible, the PCB concentrations in biota remained relatively constant or, in some cases, increased slightly. Similar trends were recorded at stations in the Eastern Mediterranean (Athens, Greece, and Izmir and Mersin, Turkey).
Despite monitoring of chlorinated pesticides by MED POL since the 1990s and the improvement of systematic monitor- ing during the past decade, spatial data coverage is not suffi- cient for drawing conclusions about the regional distribution of these compounds. Available data indicate that contami- nants are not uniformly distributed throughout the Mediter- ranean and some hot spots have been identified for specific pesticides.
plants, which may collect pesticides contained in sewage and runoff waters.
Data published between 1971 and 2005 were included in a re- gional assessment of pollution of sediments by certain POPs, namely polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and chlorinated pes- ticides like dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane and its degradation products (DDTs) and hexachlorobenzene (HCB) (Gomez-Gutier- rez et al. 2007). Despite the shortcomings in the combined data- sets, the authors were able to conclude that contamination of sediments by POPs is more a local problem, mainly associated with urban/industrial and river discharges, as well as with coastal enclosures (harbours and coastal lagoons), rather than a wide- spread issue. They also concluded that the northern Mediterra- nean coast is the area of most concern for sediment pollution by POPs and that POPs have declined – with this decline being more evident for DDTs than for PCBs. This could indicate an ongoing input of PCBs, which highlights the need for improved manage- ment of the potential sources.
The recent MED POL study (UNEP/MAP/MED POL 2011) included PCBs and chlorinated pesticides (DDTs, HCB, aldrin, endrin, diel- drin and lindane). It provides an updated view of the geographi- cal distribution and trends of POPs in biota, summarising the data mainly for blue mussels and red mullet.
PCBs were found in the vicinity of industrial and urban sites, as well as around the mouths of major rivers. Areas of concern with regard to levels of PCBs in biota include northwestern Mediterra- nean coastal areas, with generally high levels, especially around the cities of Barcelona, Marseille (with the highest values of up to 1.500 ng/g dry weight) and Genoa. Particularly high levels of PCBs were also found in biota from the coastal strip from Livorno to Nice and the mouths of the Rhone and Ebro rivers (indicating that rivers and wastewater discharges are major sources of PCBs). In the Adriatic Sea, PCBs were elevated in biota from the eastern bank and along the coasts of Croatia and Albania. Levels were generally lower in the Eastern Basin, but medium to high levels of PCBs were recorded in red mullets from Cyprus and Turkey and high values, also related to industrial and urban effluents, were recorded offshore from the Athens port of Piraeus.
In the Western Mediterranean, areas of particular concern in- clude estuaries (Rhone and Ebro), ports, bays and gulfs (Barcelo- na, Marseille-Fos, Liguria, Nador Lagoon, and the bays of Algiers, Tunis, Naples, and others). These areas have moderate levels of aldrin, HCB and DDTs. There is evidence that river inputs repre- sent the most important source of pesticides entering the West- ern Mediterranean Sea.
Several stations along the Italian coast of the Adriatic Sea had moderate values of aldrin and dieldrin, while Durres and Vlora Bay (Albania) had very high levels of DDTs and lindane. Moder- ate concentrations of lindane and DDTs were found in the Gulf of Trieste and the Marche region (Italy), respectively. In the East- ern Mediterranean, concentrations of DDTs in biota were quite low, although moderate concentrations of DDTs were present in Izmir Bay (Turkey), at three stations south of Cyprus, as well as in Saronikos, Thermaikos and Amvrakikos Gulf (Greece) where the concentrations of aldrin and dieldrin were also very high, prob- ably due to agricultural activities in the area.
The levels of chlorinated pesticides in mussels have declined since the 1990s, which is consistent with the banning of produc- tion and use of these compounds. The median values of pesti- cides in mussels from Croatia and France exhibit clear decreasing trends, as do the outlier values in the data from France. The only exception seems to be Albania (e.g., Durres and Vlora Bay), due probably to stockpiles of obsolete chlorinated pesticides. In Mer- sin (Turkey), chlorinated pesticides in mussels are decreasing, al- though occasional increases were recorded in Izmir Bay (Turkey). In general, the decrease is slower for DDT than for lindane and other chlorinated pesticides, which is consistent with the longer half-life of DDT.
The last two groups of POPs that are of concern in the Mediter- ranean Sea are mostly related to maritime traffic and boating. These are biocides (mainly organotin compounds such as tribu- tyltin, known as TBT) used in antifouling paints and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) resulting from hydrocarbon oil discharges and accidental spills, among other sources. PAHs are considered along with oil pollution in the next section.
Organotins have been detected in Mediterranean waters and sediments since the late 1980s and continue to be present in substantial concentrations despite the ban on their use in 1990. TBT degradation is slow, with a half-life ranging from weeks in shelf waters to years in deep sediments (Abdulla and Linden
HUMAN PRESSURE, STATE AND IMPACTS ON MEDITERRANEAN ECOSYSTEMS 47
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96