This book includes a plain text version that is designed for high accessibility. To use this version please follow this link.
Foreword


The Mediterranean Action Plan (MAP) was established in 1975 as a coherent legal and institutional framework for cooperation through which all Mediterranean countries decided to jointly ad- dress common challenges of environmental degradation while linking sustainable resource management with development. It was soon followed by the Barcelona Convention and seven Pro- tocols addressing issues relevant to the conservation and sus- tainable use of marine and coastal resources as well as to many policies and measures aiming to improve its management.


Information is key to the UNEP/MAP-Barcelona Convention which is first and foremost a governance framework. It acts as a catalyst facilitating cooperation and decision-making in the Mediterranean region. As it is well-known, availability and acces- sibility to relevant information is a precondition for sound policy- making and good governance.


Actions towards generating information on a more systematic basis followed the first Rio Conference 20 years ago. The Medi- terranean countries decided to strengthen their reporting of information on environmental trends, a necessary feedback to improve the effectiveness of measures undertaken. In 2008 the Contracting parties to the Convention went one step further mandating the UNEP/MAP-Barcelona Convention to prepare pe- riodic State of the Environment reports.


This State of the Mediterranean Environment report sets a new course while building on our previous thematic reports. It pro- vides information on the overall nature of the Mediterranean ecosystems and defines recurrent and new pressures – such as aquaculture and desalination – that affect the state of its envi- ronment. It also assesses the availability and quality of informa- tion and identifies knowledge gaps so as to provide guidance for scientific research and monitoring efforts undertaken by the Contracting Parties to the Barcelona Convention. Lastly, an im- portant insight on vital services provided by marine and coastal ecosystems to their inhabitants is offered.


For the first time, the report is organised around the 11 Ecologi- cal Objectives agreed by the Contracting parties to the Barcelona Convention as a common strategy for the application of the Eco- system Approach to the management of human activities. Bio- diversity conservation, coastal dynamics, fisheries management, pollution reduction, marine litter and hydrography are now agreed and presented as part of an integrated analytical and im- plementation framework which will be periodically monitored and reviewed through a rigorous six year cycle.


By doing so, this report initiates the post Rio+20 in the UNEP/ MAP-Barcelona Convention. It launches a process that address- es two main lessons outlined in the Fifth Global Environment Outlook (GEO-5) of UNEP launched at the Rio+20 Summit on Sustainable Development earlier this year. Namely, that interna- tional agreements are most successful when they tackle goals with specific targets on a reduced number of priority issues; and, that evidence-based policy-making requires more reliable data. Indeed, a striking finding from the report is the significant infor- mation gaps that still exist.


The knowledge and management agenda ahead of us is huge. I am confident, however, that over time we will be able to fulfill our ambition of building the body of knowledge and manage- ment necessary for understanding and more effectively ad- dressing cumulative risks and effects. A necessity if we are to reach the good environmental status of our battered sea and coastal ecosystems.


The report is a collaborative effort comprising UNEP/MAP-Bar- celona Convention components, parties and partners. Its main source of information is the Initial Integrated Assessment on the Ecosystems Approach which was peer-reviewed by GESAMP. The report was compiled by GRID/ARENDAL and independently re- viewed by experts on a pro bono basis. The Secretariat is grateful to all contributors to this report and looks forward to feedback and comments that could further enrich future reports.


Maria Luisa Silva Mejias Executive Secretary and Coordinator, UNEP/MAP-Barcelona Convention


7


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96