This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
| NEWS


news A


S CONCERN GROWS OVER the potential for harm caused by the faulty breast implants manufactured by Poly Implant Prothèses (PIP), the different stances taken by the


French and UK authorities over how to handle the consequences bear examination. Last month, French Health Minister Xavier


Bertrand issued a statement urging the 30000 French women with PIP implants to have them removed as a preventive measure. But the same statement says such action is not urgent. 'The message is as confusing as it is worrying


and puts too much onus onto the women with the implants,' says lead medical devices analyst, Ashley Yeo. UK Health Secretary Andrew Lansley has


adopted a more measured approach. He announced a review, but says the risk of rupture for the 40000 UK women with implants is 1%, whereas in France it is put at 3.6%. The UK’s Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) says there is no risk of cancer


Following the warning that women who had silicone breast implants manufactured by Poly Implant Prothèse (PIP), should have them removed, an Austrian private hospital, Vienna International Medical Clinic (VIMC), says it will remove PIP breast implants for free for UK women immediately. VIMC is offering to assist victims


by removing the implants, but is calling for international standards agreed by the various regulators to avoid any reoccurrence of the current problem. VIMC is starting the campaign with its own set


A round-up of news stories in the aesthetic and anti-ageing medicine industry


Sorting out who pays for explants is not the only issue to be considered


from leakage of the industrial grade filler used by PIP. In France, a number of cases of cancer have


been reported in women with the implants, but the authorities say they are not necessarily linked to the faulty implants. One woman with an anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL) cancer died in late 2011. These rather less than


categorical statements provide little comfort to the affected implantees in the 60 or more countries served by PIP: the Marseilles, France company exported to Brazil, Argentina and other South American countries, and all of the major EU countries, among others. The PIP company was closed down by the


French government, and has no money to pay for corrective surgery for the women that


PIP IMPLANTS SCANDAL CONTINUES


want it. The French government latterly said that taxpayers would fund explant procedures, but not new implants if original surgery was not done for post-breast cancer reconstruction reasons. 'Not all women who had PIP breast implants for cosmetic reasons will be able to afford a second implant, even if the explant procedure is paid for. This would leave thousands of women with little choice other than to live with their existing implants – and the fear (well founded or not) of possible sinister effects should a rupture occur,' explains Yeo.


The hesitant rectifying actions being taken by government authorities says much


for how cosmetic surgery is still perceived. Would progress be swifter were this not breast implants but another type of healthcare device?


 Turn to page 12 for Ashley Yeo's full analysis


AUSTRIAN DOCTORS AID UK WOMEN FEARING IMPLANTS The UK had not advised women


of standards as a basis for discussion.


Dr Thomas Aigner, Head Surgeon at the clinic, said: 'This is an international market so there should be international standards agreed by the various regulators. VIMC are offering free surgery time for reversals to protect the reputation of the industry as a whole and to re-emphasise the international nature of the market.' After concerns emerged about


the safety of the implants in recent months, VIMC said it was shocked that there had been widespread


use of PIP implants in the UK especially.


to have the implants removed at the time of going to print, despite banning future use of these type of implants. France has issued the advice to remove them after PIP implants were linked to eight cases of cancer there and said the government will foot the bill. The NHS would ultimately foot the bill for removals in the UK. 'We have warned of the risks of


PIP before and were taken a back by how widespread their use was in the


UK and worldwide,' said Dr Aigner. 'However, our main concern now


is for those women who will .. worry about their implants. Our surgeons have all agreed that we have a role to play in putting these people’s minds at rest, which is why we are offering to remove the PIP implants free of surgeon costs. It is our understanding that while women in the UK can get them removed for free on the NHS, there are waiting times and they will then have to foot the bill for any replacement or corrective surgery through private cosmetic surgery.


prime-journal.com | January/February 2012 ❚ 9


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92
Produced with Yudu - www.yudu.com