This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
THE EGO TRIP


We ask some of the finest game development talent a series of questions about the toughest subject of all – their own work


FOR WARD PL ANNER


FEBRUARY 2012 Recruitment Special Our annual analysis of the jobs market includes: Advice for CVs, portfolios and interviews; per-discipline guidance on getting a promotion; the education sector; our salary survey; and much, much more


Salary Survey Dissecting the data to see how industry salaries are changing


Regional Focus: Cambridge An overview of current developments and new stories from the historic University town


MARCH 2012 Game Engines


A detailed look at the evolution and diversification of the game engine, with analysis of the key trends and technologies from the sector's most experienced professionals


THIS MONTH: Sean Murray MOST FAMOUS FOR: The Joe Danger games ANSWERING QUESTIONS ON: Joe Danger


What was the parody genre-title that became associated with Joe Danger? We came up with that one, and I think we went with ‘Stunt ‘Em-Up’. We claimed Joe Danger was the first ‘Stunt ‘ Em-Up’. It’s a bit of a weird genre, so I don’t think it will catch on. CORRECT


them on fire and then throw them out the window. CORRECT


What was the exact date of the North American PSN release of Joe Danger? That would be June 8th 2010. That one is etched in my memory. That was far to intense a period not to remember. CORRECT


A particular toy was used in your studio as a powerful demonstration of game concepts. What was that toy? Oh god. I think that was Grant’s Lion-O toy. We had a box of those toys. INCORRECT: (Optimus Prime was the toy in question)


Why don’t some publishers like giant coins? Oh yes. I think they feel that they are not realistic enough. There’s no way I was going to forget that one; that was something a potential publisher said to us about the game. That’s sticking with me. CORRECT


In the first press release about Joe Danger, a childhood toy was metaphorically set on fire to capture a sense of what the game


offered. What liquid was used for this? Is that an obscure way of asking about lighter fluid? It’s lighter fluid. I used to make Airfix kits, and my brother would fill them with cotton wool and lighter fluid, set


DEVELOP-ONLINE.NET


Four new characters were introduced to the game as DLC. Can you name them all? What were their actual names? This could stump me. It was Chuckles the Chimp, Sir Bonehead, Chicken Joe, and then an Indian called either Joe Ronimo or Geronim-Joe. It was Geronim-Joe. CORRECT


Regional Focus: Middle East A focus on one of the emerging development markets and what it could mean for the rest of the industry


Event: GDC –March 5th to March 9th


APRIL 2012 QA and Localisation We take an in-depth look at this essential element of the games development process


Regional Focus: China An examination of this rising sector, and the influence it is having on the wider industry


MAY 2012 With Develop 100 insertion


Audio Special A detailed summary of music and audio for the games sector, from in-house teams through to outsourcers


Regional Focus: Australia A look at how the troubled sector has coped with recent closures and how it will progress in the future


Event: Develop Quiz –May 16th Nordic Game –May 23rd to May 25th


LEADERBOARD


1. Charles Cecil (5/6) 1. Sean Murray (5/6) 3. Martin Hollis (4/6)


Sean is now level at the top of the leaderboard with


Revolution Software man Charles Cecil. Check back next month to see if our next contestant can reach the perfect score.


JUNE 2012 AI focus A breakdown of the evolution of AI tools and technology, and the trends and developments dominating a sector that is starting to cross over with numerous related disciplines


Regional Focus: North East UK Event


E3 2012 – June 5th to June 7th UBIQ – June 18th to June 19th


EDITORIAL enquiries should go through to Will.Freeman@intentmedia.co.uk, or call him on 01992 535646


To discuss ADVERTISING contact Alex.Boucher@intentmedia.co.uk, or call him on 01992 535647


DECEMBER 2011 / JANUARY 2012 | 73


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76