This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
OPINION | ALPHA


//COMMENT: DESIGN Taxation as a tool


by David Braben, Frontier Developments


TAXATION has been used as a tool by governments through the ages to encourage particular types of behaviour, and to discourage others. Trouble is, when it comes to government, it seems to be deeply broken. I’ve taken just three examples where taxation works against the high tech industries, but there are many more.


RELOCATION TAX Our industry is quite a mobile one. Indeed, as I write this, I’m sure there are many developers looking to relocate from Australia to find work elsewhere given the recent closures of studios over there. Even within the UK, it is not unusual to have to move to follow a job – though since about 2003 this has been taxed hugely – a one-off tax of £12,000 on a typical three bedroom house outside Cambridge, for each such relocation. Given the already large cost of moving, this is a block to many people relocating, especially if they have families, whether they are coming from Australia or elsewhere in the United Kingdom. Some unlucky individuals have had to do


this for several years in a row – and as such this is an unmanageable burden. Of course, this tax is not called a relocation tax, but that is what stamp duty on primary homes amounts to - it would be easy to fix by simply taxing the uplift in value (if any), or restricting it based on distance – or even not


Legislation is so decoupled from


cause and effect – and more often than not it is the result of lobbying rather than rational consideration.


charging stamp duty on people’s primary homes. Another way of looking at it is there is a tax break for not relocating.


TAX ON UK MANUFACTURERS Manufacturing in the UK has reduced hugely over recent decades, and this would be a great trend to reverse. Differential taxation is a way this could be encouraged, but at the moment it works in the opposite direction – it pays to manufacture abroad. I’m not talking about wages or working


practises, but tax. As an example – relevant for Raspberry Pi – if computer hardware is manufactured in the UK, the manufacturer pays a lot more tax. That is because,


DEVELOP-ONLINE.NET


assuming the basic components are still imported, they attract import duty, but the completed device does not. Frankly this seems bonkers to me. So companies effectively get a tax break if they manufacture abroad.


TAX ON UK EMPLOYMENT We are just about to release Disneyland Adventures with Microsoft and Disney on Kinect, and as part of this process we ‘outsourced’ an amount of the work overseas. Australia too has now – perhaps belatedly – announced tax breaks for our industry, meaning the UK is one of the few remaining places in the world that does not have some sort of favourable government tax treatment similar to film. Again, it currently amounts to a tax break


for doing what is bad for the UK – sending work to the rest of the world. Taken together with, for example, the 37 per cent direct salary subsidy in Montreal, this is a very uneven playing field.


THE POINT? The cynic would ask; what the point is of writing a piece like this? Well, perhaps it is surprising, but more


often than not people in government do not appreciate the effect some of their decisions


have. Legislation is so decoupled from cause and effect – and more often than not it is the result of lobbying rather than rational consideration. Typically the result of a piece of legislation does not manifest itself until a future government is in place. There are occasions where the taxation


system works more helpfully – like the R&D tax credits – but overall it is way too complex and too payroll oriented. The term ‘tax breaks’ has been made to feel like a hand-out, when what it should really be is an instrument of differential taxation to encourage beneficial behaviour. My hope is that someone in government


reads this, and appreciates that changes can be revenue-neutral, or even raise revenue in the surprisingly short term. We have a taxation scheme that encourages many of the wrong things, much like the ‘window tax’ a few centuries ago backfired with bricked up windows across the UK. It can be improved very easily; we should


give it a try.


David Braben is the founder of Frontier Developments. Best known as the co-creator of Elite, Braben has contributed to a number of other projects including Frontier: Elite II, Thrillville, LostWinds and Kinectimals. www.frontier.co.uk


DECEMBER 2011 / JANUARY 2012 | 11


During the development of Disneyland Adventures some of the work was outsourced overseas to save on costs


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76