This book includes a plain text version that is designed for high accessibility. To use this version please follow this link.
CONSTRUCTION FIXINGS The results of testing for pull-out


from cellular concrete blocks of the aforementioned three groups of anchors, when analysed enable us to note the following.


Figure 3 Results of testing of anchors from 3 groups


Group 1


Trademark Manufacturer SXS 10X100


SXR 10X100 KAT N


HRD-UGS MB-S


2 3


FTP K10 KBT 10


FIS V 360 S ITH 380 MIT-P


fisher fisher


SORMAT HILTI


MUNGO fisher


SORMAT fisher


SORMAT MUNGO


Results of testing*, kN NRu,m 1.5


Nd


1.75 2


1.75 1.5 3.8 4.2 7


1.8 2


0.35 0.35 0.4


0.35 0.35 1.5 1.9 3.1 0.5 0.5


* Load values are taken as an average value for testing 5 samples


1. Pull-out resistance (bearing capacity) of anchors belonging to the first group, using a polyamide plug, depends (for majority of them) mainly on the contact area between the cylindrical plug surface and an anchor bore in a block, and also on the strength and density of the cellular concrete block. The bearing capacity of anchors with polyamide sleeve differs slightly according to different manufacturers. It should be noted that the pull-out behavior of all anchors is related to a sliding of the polyamide plug along a zone of contact with the base material.


2. Pull-out resistance (bearing capacity) of polyamide anchors with threaded design of polyamide sleeve were 4 - 5 times higher than the bearing capacity of the first group’s samples. This was due to the increased contact area with cellular concrete and formation of a pull-out cone in case of fracture (Fig. 4). One should note that, as the tests demonstrated, anchors of this type require that the installation technique should be properly followed in accordance with producers’ recommendations. Even slight additional screwing in of the anchor during installation can cause a fracture of the cellular concrete structure in the threaded zone of the anchor, which results in a sharp decrease of the anchor bearing capacity.


Figure 6 In anchoring the new


design, pull-out resistance of the anchor unit is provided not only by adhesion between the block material and injection resin, but also by the additional volume of the cellular concrete block that is involved into the work. This can be seen in Figure 7, when a conical anchor under the trademark FIS V 360 S (fischer) is pulled out from a cellular concrete block, pull-out resistance is provided by a considerable mass of the block located around the cone. At the same time the bearing capacity of the conical anchor under the trade mark FIS V 360 S (fischer) is 5 - 6 times higher than that of all other trademarks of anchors and, taking into account an anchor unit fraction behavior, the safety factor for anchor pull-out resistance calculations can be taken as the same as for evaluation of cellular concrete blocks strength according to the construction norms and regulations SNiP11-22-81 “Stone and reinforced stone structures”, i.e. k= 2.25.


Figure 7


Conclusion Analysis of experimental results obtained in the course


of determining the pull-out resistance of anchors in cellular concrete blocks enables us to note: For fastening elements of façade systems to the walls made


Figure 4


3. Bearing capacity of chemical anchors being installed into a drilled hole in a cellular concrete block depends mainly on the quality of adhesion between injection resin and cellular concrete. As the density and strength of cellular concrete is low, breakout of the anchor when it is pulled out takes place along the resin – concrete contact zone (Fig. 5). Provided that


of cellular concrete blocks it is recommended to use anchors of the second group, with a thread design. In especially critical structures, such as high-rise or unique


buildings, consideration should be given to the fischer FIS V 360 S utilising the special conical drill.


Note: The results and recommendations of this report are


published as submitted by the authors and have not been verified independently.


82 Fastener + Fixing Magazine • Issue 68 March 2011


the seating depth of chemical anchors is the same as that of anchors belonging to the first group, bearing capacity of chemical anchors appear to be higher by 30% - 40%. However, it is hardly possible to forecast increase of the anchor bearing capacity, because of the difficulty to control the quality of filling a drilled hole in cellular concrete with injection resin.


Figure 5 With the objective of increasing the bearing capacity of anchor


installed in a cellular concrete block, experts from the company fischer proposed a new design of chemical anchor. The new design envisages a change of the drilled hole shape, thanks to the use of a new drill (Fig. 6).


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164