This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
House of the T


HE House of Lords is an oversized, undemocratic, unrepresentative


and archaic institution urgently in need of reform, claims a new report.


In the first major piece of research on the House of Lords since the General Election the Electoral Reform Society has labelled the second chamber as a shockingly out of date institution full of unelected professional politicians.


The society’s ‘Fact vs Fiction’ report claims the House of Lords is growing out of control. It is already the second largest legislative chamber in the world aſter China.


There are currently 132 more unelected lawmakers than elected ones and that figure is expected to grow significantly following the government’s cuting of the size of the Commons to 600 MPs. Prime Minister David Cameron also plans to appoint a further 50 peers or so, at a cost of millions of pounds to the taxpayer.


Although Peers are unpaid they are able to claim a £300 a day tax-free allowance


72 September 2015 for atendance, plus expenses for limited travel costs.


In the 2010-2015 parliament, £360,000 was claimed by 62 Peers for years in which they did not vote once. In the last session of parliament alone over £100,000 was claimed by Peers who did not vote at all.


It’s calculated the net operating costs of the House of Lords in 2013-14 was £93.1m. That’s equivalent to around £118,000 per Peer at a time when the government is talking about reducing the cost of politics.


Close examination of the activities of individual Lords by the society’s researchers revealed they were far from being the independent experts supporters of the status quo would have the public believe.


Darren Hughes, Deputy Chief Executive of the Electoral Reform Society, said: “This research completely busts the myths peddled by supporters of an unreformed House of Lords.


Although Peers are unpaid they are able to claim a £300 a day tax-free allowance for attendance, plus expenses for limited travel costs.


“We have shown that far from being a bastion of independence, non-partisan Crossbench Peers turn up far less frequently than party-political Peers. And it’s those Peers who vote as a bloc, with Labour voting against the last coalition government, Conservative Peers voting against the last Labour government nearly 100 per cent of the time.


“On top of that, we have found that over a third of Lords


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100