search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
TECHNICAL FEATURE


Unlocking the power of water data


More frequent capture of water supply and distribution data is becoming a must-have for utilities as they strive to build network resilience, improve customer experience and meet regulatory expectations. Ovarro’s associate product line manager for RTUs & loggers Adam Wright shares insights into the latest developments


What can today’s data tell utilities about their water networks?


Data logging allows water companies to accurately and reliably record parameters for pressure, flow and level across the water network by interfacing with common industry flow meters and sensors to enable efficient network management.


Visibility of district metered areas (DMAs) combined with network models, pressure surveys, consumer flow monitoring and reservoir depth calculations all mean water companies are able to make informed decisions that will result in a reduction in cost of network ownership. With more data comes increased insight and ultimately increased value.


What aresomeof thedata capture challenges faced by utilities?


Key challenges include the sing


increasing pressure on data security, a growing need for


more battery power to send more data for longer periods and


communications reliability. These are always front of mind for Ovarro when developing and updating its data loggers.


The good news is, technology around sensors, communications and battery life is advancing rapidly. Ovarro’s data loggers can now


communicate with multiple different sensors from one device using the internet of things (IoT). They are programmed wirelessly using a Bluetooth app and data is sent securely to the cloud or the customer’s system.


The rollout of 4G and IoT networks has significantly improved communications. Ovarro has very recently updated the XiLog advanced data logger following an intensive period of research and development. The latest version comes with 4G or NBIoT/CATM1 and Bluetooth as standard, with fifth generation 5G broadband connectivity in the future.


IoT has been a real gamechanger in reducing power consumption and allowing loggers to send data more frequently. Battery technology has also progressed, allowing Ovarro’s loggers to


62 networks, will become a longer interested in investing in any


requirement. Customers are no investing


technology that has only 3G due to its limited lifespan. It is expected that 5G will eventually replace 4G, though not imminently.


What advances have been made in the reliability and frequency of data capture?


Historically, data loggers would capture data in a set schedule, say one datapoint every 30 minutes, then relay it once a day. This means that if the signal is interrupted for any reason then a whole day's data is lost. The logger would then try to send it the next day. In theory, the data could still be extracted, but it could be days later.


From an operations point of view, receiving the data as close to real-time means that personnel can act quickly to changes and irregularities Where data is delayed or lost, severe pressure


| July 2021 | www.draintraderltd.com


deliver as much as a10-year battery life. This means fewer battery changes and site visits, which reduces environmental impact, while freeing up time and saving costs.


What are the differences between 4G, 5G and IoT networks?


The difference between the available connectivity networks mostly comes down to coverage. Currently, 4G and both narrowband and LTE-MIoT are the most cost-effective options and together cover most of the world. Use of 5G is currently too expensive for most applications, but the price is slowly coming down.


IoT is available globally and IoT modems consume the least power in sending data. This means that users can either send more data or get a longer life out of the battery. By contrast, 4G mainly uses region-specific modems. The phasing out of 3G services means that 4G, which is being built out from legacy 3G


changes in the water network might be missed or not acted on until days later.


These occurrences could indicate serious incidents likes leaks, or loss of customer supply. In both cases, the water company wants to see the data as soon as possible to mitigate the impact on customers. We are seeing now that water


companies want data sent every 15 minutes or 30 minutes –


thankfully, the improvements in battery power means this is now possible.


What part can data capture play in meeting regulatory targets and net zero carbon


goals? Data logging enables efficient efficient network


management, leading to resilient and reliable water supplies - a win-win for both customers and the environment.


On the regulatory side, an efficient network means fewer bursts, supply interruptions and leaks.


The larger datasets that the updated XiLog is capable of collecting and sending are integral to the network management activities that help shape and optimise leak detection programmes.


Maintaining operational control over these critical areas will also play a part in utilities in England and Wales achieving the net zero goal on carbon emissions by 2030. If the amount of water lost through leakage is reduced, the volume of water being treated and put into supply is also reduced, cutting energy consumption and carbon emissions in the process. Similarly, if a burst or leak causes low pressure for customers, pumps must work


AdamWright


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92