This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Canadian Issues DAVID DESCÔTEAUX Taxpayers All in For the Ride


Given the company’s recent troubles, a new wave of layoffs in early 2016 wouldn’t come as a surprise. Companies such as Bombardier cannot possibly guarantee


the jobs promised by politicians. In reality, economic growth alone, not subsidies, can provide jobs. One of the unintended consequences of such “industrial policies” is to prop up and grow companies that will become dependent on aid. Governments are now faced with having to choose between the lesser of two evils: forever subsidize the aerospace industry (in an era of so-called austerity) or forsake companies that will drag thousands of jobs and suppliers down with them. In short, governments have created corpora- tions that are “too big to fail.”


Loans disguised as gifts For those who may not be aware of it, more oſten than not, these so-called government loans are actually donations. Thanks to documents obtained through the Access to


Information Act in 2010, the Canadian Taxpayers Federation revealed that since 1967, this country’s taxpayers doled out $1.9 billion in loans to Pratt & Whitney, a subsidiary of US con- glomerate United Technologies Corp., which enjoys billions in profits year aſter year. But get this: aſter nearly 50 years, Pratt & Whitney has repaid


O


N OCTOBER 29, 2015, THE QUEBEC government an- nounced it would invest more than $1.3 billion in Bombardier’s CSeries jet program. At the time of writ-


ing, Canada’s prime minister had not closed the door on pro- viding Bombardier assistance from Canadian taxpayers. It’s the same tune every time: this will protect and create thousands of jobs! But this is simply not true. Canada’s aerospace industry has


long been the “darling” of corporate welfare. For years, we have lent or given hundreds of millions of dollars to the likes of Pratt & Whitney, Bombardier and CAE. And every time, we are told it’s to create jobs. Yet the industry, especially in Quebec, employs thousands fewer workers than it did 10 years ago. In 2008, our governments provided some $500 million to


help Bombardier develop its CSeries jets. The subsidies came in the form of low-interest (read no-interest) loans repayable on the condition the company sold some of its planes. At the time, politicians were promising 3,500 new jobs. The reality is that Bombardier actually laid off thousands of workers in 2009 and 2013, and slashed at least 4,550 more jobs since July 2014.


20 | CPA MAGAZINE | JANUARY/FEBRUARY 2016


a mere $124 million, or approximately 7% of the total amount “lent.” Industry Canada maintains that the company received only $1.04 billion in loans. Still, that would represent a meagre 12% repayment rate. My purpose is not to indict Pratt & Whitney or Bombardier,


but rather those politicians who think they know how to spend our money better than we do. If we look at all the corporate loans Industry Canada has made since the 1980s, the story repeats itself, regardless of the recipient industries. According to a study by public policy think-tank Frontier Centre, the gov- ernment has been repaid just 10% of the $18 billion it lent to hundreds of companies over a 28-year period. One only hopes that Bombardier and its CSeries program


— and the entire aerospace industry, for that matter — steers through the turbulence and makes a successful landing. Whether they like it or not, Canadian taxpayers are all in for the ride.


DAVID DESCÔTEAUX is a Montreal-based business columnist and analyst at the Montreal Economic Institute


Geneviève Côté


Photo: Yanick Dery


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72